From: Lyle Johnson Date: 2002-02-23T04:40:22+09:00 Subject: Re: Windows Installer Ruby 166-0 available > >Note that this does *not* use Cygwin, so some I/O functionality > >will not be available. > > > > Hmmm. Please forgive my silly question, but does this mean that > the "installer" doesn't require Cygwin, or that ruby doesn't > use Cygwin? Both ;) The installer doesn't require Cygwin, and the Ruby it installs doesn't use Cygwin. > If the latter, what is the major advantage(s) of creating a > "native Win32" stream? Is there some pressing reason not to > use the Cygwin dll? This has been discussed heavily in the past on the newsgroup and mailing list; check the archives. Some of the pros and cons are listed on these pages: http://www.rubygarden.org/ruby?WindowsSupport http://www.rubygarden.org/ruby?FutureWindows but this isn't the whole story.