From: Paul Brannan <paul@...>
Date: 2002-02-12T23:49:17+09:00
Subject: Re: choice of HTML templating system

On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 07:49:31AM +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:
> First, would you mind if I copied this list to the wiki?

Go right ahead.  You might want to add Radical to the list, and mention
the page that Oliver Beddows pointed out.

> Second, the only reason that I wrote my own templating for RDoc is
> that I want the base RDoc to run out-of-the box, with no other
> downloads needed. Having said that, I'd be happy to make it a separate
> module if you'd like: it is self contained. (In fact I stole it from
> the code I wrote to generate triple-r over on RubyGarden).
> 
> For lightweight stuff, particularly involving nested iterated
> structures, it has proven to be pretty easy to use.

Probably not 100% necessary, since there are so many other options
already, but it would certainly make it easier for me to settle on rdoc
templating as an option.

Paul