From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) Date: 2002-02-22T17:34:51+09:00 Subject: Re: Epic4/Ruby Hi, In message "Re: Epic4/Ruby" on 02/02/22, Jonas B�low writes: |> Although I know fuzziness of the license, these three statements below |> are misleading at most. I hope you're not trying FUD against GPL. | |What do you mean with FUD against GPL? It's not just my own opinion that |GPL is the best way to destroy intellectual efforts. First of all, GPL does not necessarily destroy intellectual efforts. It just hinders "some kind of" software business. Second, the Ruby interpreter comes unter terms that (bit vague but) harmless to commercial software, no matter how your lawyer says. matz.