From: ts <decoux@...>
Date: 2002-02-25T00:47:41+09:00
Subject: Re: duplicate method name

>>>>> "R" == Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@REMOVEacm.org> writes:

R> I must be missing something, because I don't get it. What could .meth
R> possibly be other than a method call? What could the stuff in parens
R> possibly be other than the parameters?

 This is the inverse.

 .meth is interpreted as a method call and (...) is forced to be parameters
 to this method call

 This is the interpretation of (...) which is changed, not the
 interpretation of .meth


Guy Decoux