From: Alexander Danilov <alex_oscol@...>
Date: 2002-02-12T04:21:36+09:00
Subject: Re: [ANN] ByteCodeRuby 0.1.0

On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 03:12:45AM +0900, Alan Chen wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 07:03:22AM +0900, triptych wrote:
> > - you can write bytecode assembly language. This gives access to a few more
> > facilities (methods can take arguments; blocks can be passed to bytecode
> > methods; the bytecode methods can yield results) but is obviously a lot
> > fiddlier than writing Ruby.
> 
> All right, I'll ask since nobody else has. :) What are the
> possiblities of emitting Parrot code?
> 
> 

I am afraid, when the Parrot will be realised , Perl disappier as a
language, it transform to platform like Java. I don't like Java.
It's huge and slow. Ruby is light and fast enough. I would like to see
what's happend whis Parrot in the next year. I would like to have a
language , but not platform and I wish it for you.