From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2002-02-19T12:19:17+09:00
Subject: Re: Epic4/Ruby

Hi,

In message "Re: Epic4/Ruby"
    on 02/02/19, Thomas Hurst <tom.hurst@clara.net> writes:

|I would push to get Ruby adopted for a few apps I'm involved in, but
|Ruby being GPL (*spit*) will probably make this pretty much a no-go
|area, especially since Ruby isn't exactly the most well established
|language :(
|
|Matz, fancy re-licensing Ruby for us in exchange for a keyfile or two?
|(no, it's not a big company :)

Ruby is *either* GPL *or* its original terms, which is something like
Perl's Artistic license.  Does this help you?

							matz.