From: "Albert L. Wagner" Date: 2002-02-23T04:20:29+09:00 Subject: Re: Windows Installer Ruby 166-0 available Mark Probert wrote: > > Hmmm. Please forgive my silly question, but does this mean that > the "installer" doesn't require cygwin, or that ruby doesn't > use cygwin? > > If the latter, what is the major advantage(s) of creating a > "native win32" stream? Is there some pressing reason not to > use the cygwin dll? -Some- people thought so.