[#6954] Why isn't Perl highly orthogonal? — Terrence Brannon <brannon@...>

27 messages 2000/12/09

[#7022] Re: Ruby in the US — Kevin Smith <kevinbsmith@...>

> Is it possible for the US to develop corporate

36 messages 2000/12/11
[#7633] Re: Ruby in the US — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/12/19

tonys@myspleenklug.on.ca (tony summerfelt) writes:

[#7636] Re: Ruby in the US — "Joseph McDonald" <joe@...> 2000/12/19

[#7704] Re: Ruby in the US — Jilani Khaldi <jilanik@...> 2000/12/19

> > first candidates would be mysql and postgressql because source is

[#7705] Code sample for improvement — Stephen White <steve@...> 2000/12/19

During an idle chat with someone on IRC, they presented some fairly

[#7750] Re: Code sample for improvement — "Guy N. Hurst" <gnhurst@...> 2000/12/20

Stephen White wrote:

[#7751] Re: Code sample for improvement — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/20

Hello --

[#7755] Re: Code sample for improvement — "Guy N. Hurst" <gnhurst@...> 2000/12/20

David Alan Black wrote:

[#7758] Re: Code sample for improvement — Stephen White <steve@...> 2000/12/20

On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Guy N. Hurst wrote:

[#7759] Next amusing problem: talking integers (was Re: Code sample for improvement) — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/20

On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Stephen White wrote:

[#7212] New User Survey: we need your opinions — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

16 messages 2000/12/14

[#7330] A Java Developer's Wish List for Ruby — "Richard A.Schulman" <RichardASchulman@...>

I see Ruby as having a very bright future as a language to

22 messages 2000/12/15

[#7354] Ruby performance question — Eric Crampton <EricCrampton@...>

I'm parsing simple text lines which look like this:

21 messages 2000/12/15
[#7361] Re: Ruby performance question — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/12/15

Eric Crampton <EricCrampton@worldnet.att.net> writes:

[#7367] Re: Ruby performance question — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/16

On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#7371] Re: Ruby performance question — "Joseph McDonald" <joe@...> 2000/12/16

[#7366] GUIs for Rubies — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Thought I'd switch the subject line to the subject at hand.

22 messages 2000/12/16

[#7416] Re: Ruby IDE (again) — Kevin Smith <kevins14@...>

>> >> I would contribute to this project, if it

17 messages 2000/12/16
[#7422] Re: Ruby IDE (again) — Holden Glova <dsafari@...> 2000/12/16

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[#7582] New to Ruby — takaoueda@...

I have just started learning Ruby with the book of Thomas and Hunt. The

24 messages 2000/12/18

[#7604] Any corrections for Programming Ruby — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

12 messages 2000/12/18

[#7737] strange border-case Numeric errors — "Brian F. Feldman" <green@...>

I haven't had a good enough chance to familiarize myself with the code in

19 messages 2000/12/20

[#7801] Is Ruby part of any standard GNU Linux distributions? — "Pete McBreen, McBreen.Consulting" <mcbreenp@...>

Anybody know what it would take to get Ruby into the standard GNU Linux

15 messages 2000/12/20

[#7938] Re: defined? problem? — Kevin Smith <sent@...>

matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) wrote:

26 messages 2000/12/22
[#7943] Re: defined? problem? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/12/22

Kevin Smith <sent@qualitycode.com> writes:

[#7950] Re: defined? problem? — Stephen White <steve@...> 2000/12/22

On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#7951] Re: defined? problem? — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/22

On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Stephen White wrote:

[#7954] Re: defined? problem? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/12/22

David Alan Black <dblack@candle.superlink.net> writes:

[#7975] Re: defined? problem? — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/22

Hello --

[#7971] Hash access method — Ted Meng <ted_meng@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2000/12/22

[#8030] Re: Basic hash question — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "B" == Ben Tilly <ben_tilly@hotmail.com> writes:

15 messages 2000/12/24
[#8033] Re: Basic hash question — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2000/12/24

On Sun, 24 Dec 2000, ts wrote:

[#8178] Inexplicable core dump — "Nathaniel Talbott" <ntalbott@...>

I have some code that looks like this:

12 messages 2000/12/28

[#8196] My first impression of Ruby. Lack of overloading? (long) — jmichel@... (Jean Michel)

Hello,

23 messages 2000/12/28

[#8198] Re: Ruby cron scheduler for NT available — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

John Small wrote:

14 messages 2000/12/28

[#8287] Re: speedup of anagram finder — "SHULTZ,BARRY (HP-Israel,ex1)" <barry_shultz@...>

> -----Original Message-----

12 messages 2000/12/29

[ruby-talk:8384] Re: Ruby 1.6.2

From: "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>
Date: 2000-12-31 06:22:09 UTC
List: ruby-talk #8384
Conrad Schneiker wrote:

# As always, thanks for the latest and greatest Ruby.
# 
# For AIX 4.3, Ruby 1.6.2 built fine. 
# 
# However I encountered problems trying to build Ruby 1.6.2 under
# AIX5L on the IA64 platform. (FWIW, before trying to build Ruby
# 1.6.2, I was able to build glib and GTK+ and run the helloworld.c
# demo with no problems.)

Well, I think I know what the problem is; the following changes (adding 
"&& ! defined(_IA64)" in a couple of places seems to fix the original 
problem:

======================================================
# diff -c dln.c.orig dln.c
*** dln.c.orig  Sat Dec 30 23:28:53 2000
--- dln.c       Sat Dec 30 23:38:33 2000
***************
*** 1166,1172 ****
  }
 
 
! #if defined(_AIX)
  static void
  aix_loaderror(const char *pathname)
  {
--- 1166,1172 ----
  }
 
 
! #if defined(_AIX) && ! defined(_IA64)
  static void
  aix_loaderror(const char *pathname)
  {
***************
*** 1310,1316 ****
      }
  #endif /* hpux */
 
! #if defined(_AIX)
  #define DLN_DEFINED
      {
        void (*init_fct)();
--- 1310,1316 ----
      }
  #endif /* hpux */
 
! #if defined(_AIX) && ! defined(_IA64)
  #define DLN_DEFINED
      {
        void (*init_fct)();
======================================================

However, there is another problem that will take a change to configure, 
and I'm not sure of how you want to handle it. On the IA64 platform, ld 
works more like the SCO ld in terms of options (i.e. it is not a port of 
the AIX ld on the PPC platform). Hence this error:

======================================================
        /usr/ccs/bin/ld  -brtl -eInit_curses 
-bI:/driver/tools/src/ruby/ruby-1.6.2/ruby.im
p -bM:SRE -T512 -H512 -lc -L/driver/tools/src/ruby/ruby-1.6.2  -o 
curses.so curses.o  -lcu
rses -ltermcap -lc 
/usr/ccs/bin/ld: illegal option -- H
ld: ld [-abmrstvGV] [-defholuyzBILMR argument] file(s) ...
make: The error code from the last command is 1.

Stop.
======================================================

Conrad Schneiker
(This note is unofficial and subject to improvement without notice.)

In This Thread

Prev Next