From: Jim Menard <jimm@...>
Date: 2000-12-29T06:40:03+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:8200] Re: My first impression of Ruby. Lack of overloading? (long)

I'll try to answer the easy ones.

jmichel@schur.institut.math.jussieu.fr (Jean Michel) writes:

>     the reason why sort! does not return its result for arrays of length
>     1 eludes me.

sort! returs nil if the message receiver (the array) is not changed, as do
many (but not all) of the "!" methods.

>   - I was very surprised that  each_pair is not defined for arrays, only
>     hashes. Of course you can roll your own:

Try each_with_index instead.

    [1, 2, 3].each_with_index { | value, index |
	...
    }

This method is defined in the Enumeration (or Enumerable) module.

>   - I  have some problems with  scopes. In particular, that  one can not
>   define local functions.  The closest I could come with  is to define a
>   local Proc object and use .call on it. Is that the recommended way?

That's certainly possible, but we tend to use blocks instead of anonymous
subroutines.

Jim
-- 
Jim Menard, jimm@io.com, http://www.io.com/~jimm/
"I invented the term Object-Oriented, and I can tell you I did not have C++
in mind." -- Alan Kay