[#6954] Why isn't Perl highly orthogonal? — Terrence Brannon <brannon@...>

27 messages 2000/12/09

[#7022] Re: Ruby in the US — Kevin Smith <kevinbsmith@...>

> Is it possible for the US to develop corporate

36 messages 2000/12/11
[#7633] Re: Ruby in the US — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/12/19

tonys@myspleenklug.on.ca (tony summerfelt) writes:

[#7636] Re: Ruby in the US — "Joseph McDonald" <joe@...> 2000/12/19

[#7704] Re: Ruby in the US — Jilani Khaldi <jilanik@...> 2000/12/19

> > first candidates would be mysql and postgressql because source is

[#7705] Code sample for improvement — Stephen White <steve@...> 2000/12/19

During an idle chat with someone on IRC, they presented some fairly

[#7750] Re: Code sample for improvement — "Guy N. Hurst" <gnhurst@...> 2000/12/20

Stephen White wrote:

[#7751] Re: Code sample for improvement — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/20

Hello --

[#7755] Re: Code sample for improvement — "Guy N. Hurst" <gnhurst@...> 2000/12/20

David Alan Black wrote:

[#7758] Re: Code sample for improvement — Stephen White <steve@...> 2000/12/20

On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Guy N. Hurst wrote:

[#7759] Next amusing problem: talking integers (was Re: Code sample for improvement) — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/20

On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Stephen White wrote:

[#7212] New User Survey: we need your opinions — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

16 messages 2000/12/14

[#7330] A Java Developer's Wish List for Ruby — "Richard A.Schulman" <RichardASchulman@...>

I see Ruby as having a very bright future as a language to

22 messages 2000/12/15

[#7354] Ruby performance question — Eric Crampton <EricCrampton@...>

I'm parsing simple text lines which look like this:

21 messages 2000/12/15
[#7361] Re: Ruby performance question — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/12/15

Eric Crampton <EricCrampton@worldnet.att.net> writes:

[#7367] Re: Ruby performance question — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/16

On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#7371] Re: Ruby performance question — "Joseph McDonald" <joe@...> 2000/12/16

[#7366] GUIs for Rubies — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Thought I'd switch the subject line to the subject at hand.

22 messages 2000/12/16

[#7416] Re: Ruby IDE (again) — Kevin Smith <kevins14@...>

>> >> I would contribute to this project, if it

17 messages 2000/12/16
[#7422] Re: Ruby IDE (again) — Holden Glova <dsafari@...> 2000/12/16

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[#7582] New to Ruby — takaoueda@...

I have just started learning Ruby with the book of Thomas and Hunt. The

24 messages 2000/12/18

[#7604] Any corrections for Programming Ruby — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

12 messages 2000/12/18

[#7737] strange border-case Numeric errors — "Brian F. Feldman" <green@...>

I haven't had a good enough chance to familiarize myself with the code in

19 messages 2000/12/20

[#7801] Is Ruby part of any standard GNU Linux distributions? — "Pete McBreen, McBreen.Consulting" <mcbreenp@...>

Anybody know what it would take to get Ruby into the standard GNU Linux

15 messages 2000/12/20

[#7938] Re: defined? problem? — Kevin Smith <sent@...>

matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) wrote:

26 messages 2000/12/22
[#7943] Re: defined? problem? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/12/22

Kevin Smith <sent@qualitycode.com> writes:

[#7950] Re: defined? problem? — Stephen White <steve@...> 2000/12/22

On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#7951] Re: defined? problem? — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/22

On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Stephen White wrote:

[#7954] Re: defined? problem? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/12/22

David Alan Black <dblack@candle.superlink.net> writes:

[#7975] Re: defined? problem? — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/22

Hello --

[#7971] Hash access method — Ted Meng <ted_meng@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2000/12/22

[#8030] Re: Basic hash question — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "B" == Ben Tilly <ben_tilly@hotmail.com> writes:

15 messages 2000/12/24
[#8033] Re: Basic hash question — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2000/12/24

On Sun, 24 Dec 2000, ts wrote:

[#8178] Inexplicable core dump — "Nathaniel Talbott" <ntalbott@...>

I have some code that looks like this:

12 messages 2000/12/28

[#8196] My first impression of Ruby. Lack of overloading? (long) — jmichel@... (Jean Michel)

Hello,

23 messages 2000/12/28

[#8198] Re: Ruby cron scheduler for NT available — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

John Small wrote:

14 messages 2000/12/28

[#8287] Re: speedup of anagram finder — "SHULTZ,BARRY (HP-Israel,ex1)" <barry_shultz@...>

> -----Original Message-----

12 messages 2000/12/29

[ruby-talk:8137] Re: Method as block to method

From: "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>
Date: 2000-12-27 20:03:21 UTC
List: ruby-talk #8137
Jon Babcock wrote:

# re kmail: I'm not sure about the dev. of kmail versus balsa, kmail
# may be more vigorous, but I was thinking of KDE versus Gnome. And
# not just the rate of new versions, but the feeling I get that there
# are magnitudes more developers working on Gnome, ...

I don't know what the numbers currently are, but several factors make it 
*seem* likely that Gnome will numerically prevail: (1) the MS Win KDE 
licensing issue, (2) planned MS Win, MacOS, and BeOS in Gnome 2, (3) Sun 
commitment to Gnome. Cases 1 & 2 involve (-, +) *potential* mind-share on 
a hugely popular platform (numerically, that is :-) and case 3 involves 
*actual* mind-share on a very widespread UNIX platform whose 
user/developer community (AFAIK) is probably still substantially larger 
than the Linux community.
 
# Well, I think what "I" need most is a "MUI" (my invention), a
# Mmenomic User Interface. It's that aspect of the GUI that is most
# important.  The eye candy could be achieved in an acceptable way on
# Emacs under X. It is also somewhat the difference between mouse and
# kb, but I think that distinction is less important than the mmenomic
# assistenece that the GUI offers. So if going to the right place to
# click or having the right command to type were equally easy, then a
# simple window manager on X with Emacs and emacs-like apps, would be
# a matter of taste.

I think a lot more could be done on KB-GUI *hybrids*. To take Win/NT for 
example, there could be much more generalizing of right-click options that 
allow you to use the KB (e.g. rename for files and bookmarks). In cases 
where you need to select an application from a list, it would be nice to 
have a type-in box that was PATH-aware. It would be nice if the 
right-mouse-button menu open option for desktop icons had an alternative 
or sub-option that made it easy to specify parameters to be appended to 
the shortcut command string. It would be nice if there was some easy way 
of adding and customizing such things, just as you can do in a similar 
(but presently too-limited to too-clunky) fashion for browser bookmarks. 
Likewise, it would be nice if command-line commands had an optional switch 
for a GUI-ized version showing valid parameter options, with your most 
commonly used settings as defaults, and/or with a text/icon labeled list 
of the 10 most recently used combinations (and some mechanism for pinning 
the items you always want retained). And of course it would be nice to 
have a portable, user-specific, system-independent, configuration database 
for your accumulated customizations.

Conrad Schneiker
(This note is unofficial and subject to improvement without notice.)

In This Thread

Prev Next