From: Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>
Date: 2000-12-18T16:57:57+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:7559] Re: flatten_by(n)

> Also the name of concat is descriptive enough (at least to me). So there's
> no need to have specificly concat!.

a.concat(b) could mean either "concatenate b in a" or "concatenation of
a and b", which could have been disambiguated as "concat!" and "concat"
respectively. it may be too late.

those who may like the current "concat" are most possibly C programmers.

matju