From: claird@... (Cameron Laird) Date: 2000-12-20T14:40:03+09:00 Subject: [ruby-talk:7738] Re: Ruby in the US In article <3A3FAC52.E1E9DCD@tin.it>, Jilani Khaldi wrote: >> > first candidates would be mysql and postgressql because source is >> > available. >> InterBase (www.ibphoenix.com) is much more better than both (refrential >> integrity, stored >> procedures, triggers, matrices, views, subselect .. and many other... >Transactions, above all. . . . Postgres supports transactions, and has for quite some time. MySQL does not, but is maneuvering to do so. I'm a teensy bit skeptical about whether it ever will. Interbase *should* be a survivor. Will it be, though? -- Cameron Laird Business: http://www.Phaseit.net Personal: http://starbase.neosoft.com/~claird/home.html