[#6954] Why isn't Perl highly orthogonal? — Terrence Brannon <brannon@...>

27 messages 2000/12/09

[#7022] Re: Ruby in the US — Kevin Smith <kevinbsmith@...>

> Is it possible for the US to develop corporate

36 messages 2000/12/11
[#7633] Re: Ruby in the US — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/12/19

tonys@myspleenklug.on.ca (tony summerfelt) writes:

[#7636] Re: Ruby in the US — "Joseph McDonald" <joe@...> 2000/12/19

[#7704] Re: Ruby in the US — Jilani Khaldi <jilanik@...> 2000/12/19

> > first candidates would be mysql and postgressql because source is

[#7705] Code sample for improvement — Stephen White <steve@...> 2000/12/19

During an idle chat with someone on IRC, they presented some fairly

[#7750] Re: Code sample for improvement — "Guy N. Hurst" <gnhurst@...> 2000/12/20

Stephen White wrote:

[#7751] Re: Code sample for improvement — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/20

Hello --

[#7755] Re: Code sample for improvement — "Guy N. Hurst" <gnhurst@...> 2000/12/20

David Alan Black wrote:

[#7758] Re: Code sample for improvement — Stephen White <steve@...> 2000/12/20

On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Guy N. Hurst wrote:

[#7759] Next amusing problem: talking integers (was Re: Code sample for improvement) — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/20

On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Stephen White wrote:

[#7212] New User Survey: we need your opinions — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

16 messages 2000/12/14

[#7330] A Java Developer's Wish List for Ruby — "Richard A.Schulman" <RichardASchulman@...>

I see Ruby as having a very bright future as a language to

22 messages 2000/12/15

[#7354] Ruby performance question — Eric Crampton <EricCrampton@...>

I'm parsing simple text lines which look like this:

21 messages 2000/12/15
[#7361] Re: Ruby performance question — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/12/15

Eric Crampton <EricCrampton@worldnet.att.net> writes:

[#7367] Re: Ruby performance question — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/16

On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#7371] Re: Ruby performance question — "Joseph McDonald" <joe@...> 2000/12/16

[#7366] GUIs for Rubies — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Thought I'd switch the subject line to the subject at hand.

22 messages 2000/12/16

[#7416] Re: Ruby IDE (again) — Kevin Smith <kevins14@...>

>> >> I would contribute to this project, if it

17 messages 2000/12/16
[#7422] Re: Ruby IDE (again) — Holden Glova <dsafari@...> 2000/12/16

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[#7582] New to Ruby — takaoueda@...

I have just started learning Ruby with the book of Thomas and Hunt. The

24 messages 2000/12/18

[#7604] Any corrections for Programming Ruby — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

12 messages 2000/12/18

[#7737] strange border-case Numeric errors — "Brian F. Feldman" <green@...>

I haven't had a good enough chance to familiarize myself with the code in

19 messages 2000/12/20

[#7801] Is Ruby part of any standard GNU Linux distributions? — "Pete McBreen, McBreen.Consulting" <mcbreenp@...>

Anybody know what it would take to get Ruby into the standard GNU Linux

15 messages 2000/12/20

[#7938] Re: defined? problem? — Kevin Smith <sent@...>

matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) wrote:

26 messages 2000/12/22
[#7943] Re: defined? problem? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/12/22

Kevin Smith <sent@qualitycode.com> writes:

[#7950] Re: defined? problem? — Stephen White <steve@...> 2000/12/22

On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#7951] Re: defined? problem? — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/22

On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Stephen White wrote:

[#7954] Re: defined? problem? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/12/22

David Alan Black <dblack@candle.superlink.net> writes:

[#7975] Re: defined? problem? — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/22

Hello --

[#7971] Hash access method — Ted Meng <ted_meng@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2000/12/22

[#8030] Re: Basic hash question — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "B" == Ben Tilly <ben_tilly@hotmail.com> writes:

15 messages 2000/12/24
[#8033] Re: Basic hash question — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2000/12/24

On Sun, 24 Dec 2000, ts wrote:

[#8178] Inexplicable core dump — "Nathaniel Talbott" <ntalbott@...>

I have some code that looks like this:

12 messages 2000/12/28

[#8196] My first impression of Ruby. Lack of overloading? (long) — jmichel@... (Jean Michel)

Hello,

23 messages 2000/12/28

[#8198] Re: Ruby cron scheduler for NT available — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

John Small wrote:

14 messages 2000/12/28

[#8287] Re: speedup of anagram finder — "SHULTZ,BARRY (HP-Israel,ex1)" <barry_shultz@...>

> -----Original Message-----

12 messages 2000/12/29

[ruby-talk:8288] Re: Inexplicable core dump [long]

From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2000-12-29 18:31:23 UTC
List: ruby-talk #8288
Hi,

In message "[ruby-talk:8257] Re: Inexplicable core dump [long]"
    on 00/12/29, "Nathaniel Talbott" <ntalbott@rolemodelsoft.com> writes:

|Cool! Thanks for the pointer; I'm sure it will be useful in the future as
|well. Here it is:
|
|__BEGIN__
|Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
|0x47a68d in st_lookup (table=0x40f788,
|    key=0x1219 <Address 0x1219 out of bounds>, value=0x2593010) at st.c:253
|253         hash_val = do_hash(key, table);

...

<snip>

Thank you.  The backtrace helped me a lot.  I found a GC mark leakage.
The smallest error reproducing script was

  proc = self.method(:printf).to_proc
  GC.start
  proc.call("abc\n")

Here's the patch.  Hope this helps you.

							matz.

--- ChangeLog	2000/12/29 02:47:06	1.289
+++ ChangeLog	2000/12/29 18:17:58
@@ -1 +1,11 @@
+Sat Dec 30 03:14:22 2000  Yukihiro Matsumoto  <matz@ruby-lang.org>
+
+	* eval.c (rb_iterate): NODE_CFUNC does not protect its data
+	  (nd_tval), so create new node NODE_IFUNC for iteration C
+	  function. 
+
+	* eval.c (rb_yield_0): use NODE_IFUNC.
+
+	* gc.c (rb_gc_mark): support NODE_IFUNC.
+
 Fri Dec 29 11:41:55 2000  Yukihiro Matsumoto  <matz@ruby-lang.org>
--- node.h	2000/12/05 09:36:32	1.18
+++ node.h	2000/12/29 18:17:59
@@ -23,2 +23,3 @@
     NODE_CFUNC,
+    NODE_IFUNC,
     NODE_SCOPE,
@@ -236,2 +237,3 @@
 #define NEW_CFUNC(f,c) rb_node_newnode(NODE_CFUNC,f,c,0)
+#define NEW_IFUNC(f,c) rb_node_newnode(NODE_IFUNC,f,c,0)
 #define NEW_RFUNC(b1,b2) NEW_SCOPE(block_append(b1,b2))
--- eval.c	2000/12/29 02:46:09	1.140
+++ eval.c	2000/12/29 18:18:11
@@ -3747,3 +3747,3 @@
     volatile VALUE retval = Qnil;
-    NODE *node = NEW_CFUNC(bl_proc, data2);
+    NODE *node = NEW_IFUNC(bl_proc, data2);
     VALUE self = ruby_top_self;
--- gc.c	2000/12/29 02:47:07	1.50
+++ gc.c	2000/12/29 18:18:13
@@ -482,2 +482,3 @@
 	    /* fall through */
+	  case NODE_IFUNC:
 	  case NODE_METHOD:	/* 2 */

In This Thread