[#6954] Why isn't Perl highly orthogonal? — Terrence Brannon <brannon@...>

27 messages 2000/12/09

[#7022] Re: Ruby in the US — Kevin Smith <kevinbsmith@...>

> Is it possible for the US to develop corporate

36 messages 2000/12/11
[#7633] Re: Ruby in the US — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/12/19

tonys@myspleenklug.on.ca (tony summerfelt) writes:

[#7636] Re: Ruby in the US — "Joseph McDonald" <joe@...> 2000/12/19

[#7704] Re: Ruby in the US — Jilani Khaldi <jilanik@...> 2000/12/19

> > first candidates would be mysql and postgressql because source is

[#7705] Code sample for improvement — Stephen White <steve@...> 2000/12/19

During an idle chat with someone on IRC, they presented some fairly

[#7750] Re: Code sample for improvement — "Guy N. Hurst" <gnhurst@...> 2000/12/20

Stephen White wrote:

[#7751] Re: Code sample for improvement — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/20

Hello --

[#7755] Re: Code sample for improvement — "Guy N. Hurst" <gnhurst@...> 2000/12/20

David Alan Black wrote:

[#7758] Re: Code sample for improvement — Stephen White <steve@...> 2000/12/20

On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Guy N. Hurst wrote:

[#7759] Next amusing problem: talking integers (was Re: Code sample for improvement) — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/20

On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Stephen White wrote:

[#7212] New User Survey: we need your opinions — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

16 messages 2000/12/14

[#7330] A Java Developer's Wish List for Ruby — "Richard A.Schulman" <RichardASchulman@...>

I see Ruby as having a very bright future as a language to

22 messages 2000/12/15

[#7354] Ruby performance question — Eric Crampton <EricCrampton@...>

I'm parsing simple text lines which look like this:

21 messages 2000/12/15
[#7361] Re: Ruby performance question — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/12/15

Eric Crampton <EricCrampton@worldnet.att.net> writes:

[#7367] Re: Ruby performance question — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/16

On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#7371] Re: Ruby performance question — "Joseph McDonald" <joe@...> 2000/12/16

[#7366] GUIs for Rubies — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Thought I'd switch the subject line to the subject at hand.

22 messages 2000/12/16

[#7416] Re: Ruby IDE (again) — Kevin Smith <kevins14@...>

>> >> I would contribute to this project, if it

17 messages 2000/12/16
[#7422] Re: Ruby IDE (again) — Holden Glova <dsafari@...> 2000/12/16

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[#7582] New to Ruby — takaoueda@...

I have just started learning Ruby with the book of Thomas and Hunt. The

24 messages 2000/12/18

[#7604] Any corrections for Programming Ruby — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

12 messages 2000/12/18

[#7737] strange border-case Numeric errors — "Brian F. Feldman" <green@...>

I haven't had a good enough chance to familiarize myself with the code in

19 messages 2000/12/20

[#7801] Is Ruby part of any standard GNU Linux distributions? — "Pete McBreen, McBreen.Consulting" <mcbreenp@...>

Anybody know what it would take to get Ruby into the standard GNU Linux

15 messages 2000/12/20

[#7938] Re: defined? problem? — Kevin Smith <sent@...>

matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) wrote:

26 messages 2000/12/22
[#7943] Re: defined? problem? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/12/22

Kevin Smith <sent@qualitycode.com> writes:

[#7950] Re: defined? problem? — Stephen White <steve@...> 2000/12/22

On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#7951] Re: defined? problem? — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/22

On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Stephen White wrote:

[#7954] Re: defined? problem? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/12/22

David Alan Black <dblack@candle.superlink.net> writes:

[#7975] Re: defined? problem? — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/22

Hello --

[#7971] Hash access method — Ted Meng <ted_meng@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2000/12/22

[#8030] Re: Basic hash question — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "B" == Ben Tilly <ben_tilly@hotmail.com> writes:

15 messages 2000/12/24
[#8033] Re: Basic hash question — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2000/12/24

On Sun, 24 Dec 2000, ts wrote:

[#8178] Inexplicable core dump — "Nathaniel Talbott" <ntalbott@...>

I have some code that looks like this:

12 messages 2000/12/28

[#8196] My first impression of Ruby. Lack of overloading? (long) — jmichel@... (Jean Michel)

Hello,

23 messages 2000/12/28

[#8198] Re: Ruby cron scheduler for NT available — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

John Small wrote:

14 messages 2000/12/28

[#8287] Re: speedup of anagram finder — "SHULTZ,BARRY (HP-Israel,ex1)" <barry_shultz@...>

> -----Original Message-----

12 messages 2000/12/29

[ruby-talk:6738] Re: perl and ruby

From: Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Date: 2000-12-02 10:10:01 UTC
List: ruby-talk #6738
>>>>> "Joseph" == Joseph McDonald <joe@vpop.net> writes:

    Joseph> I'm a perl guy checking out ruby.  I wanted to benchmark a
    Joseph> few things that I do a lot of (using hashes, split,
    Joseph> etc...).  So here is a little snippet:

So may I welcome here :-)

I was also coming from Python/Perl to Ruby. Ironically it was a
Pythoneer that has interested me in Ruby ;-)

    Joseph> A couple of things I noticed which sort of annoyed me: I
    Joseph> had to predeclare the hash and the scaler.  x++ didn't

You had not, as Dave already explained ...

    Joseph> work (which I found out from the FAQ). x = x +1; gave a
    Joseph> syntax error.  interpolation with #{var} doesn't seem as
    Joseph> user friendly...

Dave and David have already answered your questions excellently. Let
me only state another thing ...

You should NOT see Ruby as similiar to Perl. In reality these both
languages are much different from each other. IMHO, there are only
three features that makes them looks familiar ...

o Special global variables like: $/, $\, $$, ...
  For many of them there are senseful replacements if you require the
  module English. But I hope requiring of that module would not be
  necessary in the future anymore (means these variables become
  standard).

o Some built-in creation syntax like: /.../, .., {}, [], ...
  Like in Perl you can use /.../ to describe an regexp; you can use
  '..' to indicate a range; etc. But unlike Perl, these all are true
  objects in the sense of Smalltalk.

  Ruby works only with references. Seeing this it would become clear
  to you, why you have to assign values to the variables. Ruby's 
  'h = {}' is more like Perl's '$h = {}' and therefore not a
  declaration but a definition and/or assignment.

o Statement modifier like: ... if, ... while

But despite from these three familarities, I would not call Ruby
similar to Perl. IMO, matz was very tricky with Ruby! He has let it
look like Perl to draw attention, but then if you realize the
differences you are so fascinated afterwards of its power and
flexibility that you do not want to leave it then ;-)

But seeing Ruby only from a Perl POV will not let you detect all the
power and elegance Ruby owns. The similarities will help you to hack
together some small scripts, but you should really try to give Ruby a
chance by following Ruby's way of doing. Do not try to program Perl or
Python in Ruby. You dismiss too much of its power then!


    Joseph> I'm not here to bash ruby, I am just starting to explore
    Joseph> it, it looks like a fun language, I just wanted to point
    Joseph> out some things that a perl person may find annoying in
    Joseph> the hopes that perhaps some of these things can be
    Joseph> changed.

Ruby IS NOT Perl. The sooner you realize it, the sooner you will be
ready to get used to its real power, elegance and fun!


    Joseph> thanks, -joe

Thank you for giving it a try. Although our community is growing,
there cannot be enough people using it. :-)

\cle


In This Thread