[#6954] Why isn't Perl highly orthogonal? — Terrence Brannon <brannon@...>

27 messages 2000/12/09

[#7022] Re: Ruby in the US — Kevin Smith <kevinbsmith@...>

> Is it possible for the US to develop corporate

36 messages 2000/12/11
[#7633] Re: Ruby in the US — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/12/19

tonys@myspleenklug.on.ca (tony summerfelt) writes:

[#7636] Re: Ruby in the US — "Joseph McDonald" <joe@...> 2000/12/19

[#7704] Re: Ruby in the US — Jilani Khaldi <jilanik@...> 2000/12/19

> > first candidates would be mysql and postgressql because source is

[#7705] Code sample for improvement — Stephen White <steve@...> 2000/12/19

During an idle chat with someone on IRC, they presented some fairly

[#7750] Re: Code sample for improvement — "Guy N. Hurst" <gnhurst@...> 2000/12/20

Stephen White wrote:

[#7751] Re: Code sample for improvement — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/20

Hello --

[#7755] Re: Code sample for improvement — "Guy N. Hurst" <gnhurst@...> 2000/12/20

David Alan Black wrote:

[#7758] Re: Code sample for improvement — Stephen White <steve@...> 2000/12/20

On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Guy N. Hurst wrote:

[#7759] Next amusing problem: talking integers (was Re: Code sample for improvement) — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/20

On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Stephen White wrote:

[#7212] New User Survey: we need your opinions — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

16 messages 2000/12/14

[#7330] A Java Developer's Wish List for Ruby — "Richard A.Schulman" <RichardASchulman@...>

I see Ruby as having a very bright future as a language to

22 messages 2000/12/15

[#7354] Ruby performance question — Eric Crampton <EricCrampton@...>

I'm parsing simple text lines which look like this:

21 messages 2000/12/15
[#7361] Re: Ruby performance question — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/12/15

Eric Crampton <EricCrampton@worldnet.att.net> writes:

[#7367] Re: Ruby performance question — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/16

On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#7371] Re: Ruby performance question — "Joseph McDonald" <joe@...> 2000/12/16

[#7366] GUIs for Rubies — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Thought I'd switch the subject line to the subject at hand.

22 messages 2000/12/16

[#7416] Re: Ruby IDE (again) — Kevin Smith <kevins14@...>

>> >> I would contribute to this project, if it

17 messages 2000/12/16
[#7422] Re: Ruby IDE (again) — Holden Glova <dsafari@...> 2000/12/16

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[#7582] New to Ruby — takaoueda@...

I have just started learning Ruby with the book of Thomas and Hunt. The

24 messages 2000/12/18

[#7604] Any corrections for Programming Ruby — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

12 messages 2000/12/18

[#7737] strange border-case Numeric errors — "Brian F. Feldman" <green@...>

I haven't had a good enough chance to familiarize myself with the code in

19 messages 2000/12/20

[#7801] Is Ruby part of any standard GNU Linux distributions? — "Pete McBreen, McBreen.Consulting" <mcbreenp@...>

Anybody know what it would take to get Ruby into the standard GNU Linux

15 messages 2000/12/20

[#7938] Re: defined? problem? — Kevin Smith <sent@...>

matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) wrote:

26 messages 2000/12/22
[#7943] Re: defined? problem? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/12/22

Kevin Smith <sent@qualitycode.com> writes:

[#7950] Re: defined? problem? — Stephen White <steve@...> 2000/12/22

On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#7951] Re: defined? problem? — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/22

On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Stephen White wrote:

[#7954] Re: defined? problem? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/12/22

David Alan Black <dblack@candle.superlink.net> writes:

[#7975] Re: defined? problem? — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/22

Hello --

[#7971] Hash access method — Ted Meng <ted_meng@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2000/12/22

[#8030] Re: Basic hash question — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "B" == Ben Tilly <ben_tilly@hotmail.com> writes:

15 messages 2000/12/24
[#8033] Re: Basic hash question — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2000/12/24

On Sun, 24 Dec 2000, ts wrote:

[#8178] Inexplicable core dump — "Nathaniel Talbott" <ntalbott@...>

I have some code that looks like this:

12 messages 2000/12/28

[#8196] My first impression of Ruby. Lack of overloading? (long) — jmichel@... (Jean Michel)

Hello,

23 messages 2000/12/28

[#8198] Re: Ruby cron scheduler for NT available — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

John Small wrote:

14 messages 2000/12/28

[#8287] Re: speedup of anagram finder — "SHULTZ,BARRY (HP-Israel,ex1)" <barry_shultz@...>

> -----Original Message-----

12 messages 2000/12/29

[ruby-talk:8315] Re: speedup of anagram finder

From: "Christoph Rippel" <crippel@...>
Date: 2000-12-29 23:40:02 UTC
List: ruby-talk #8315
"SHULTZ,BARRY (HP-Israel,ex1)" <barry_shultz@hp.com> wrote in message
news:733CA39D4982D411AD080090278CBE390BCCE8@shalom.israel.hp.com...
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Alan Black [mailto:dblack@candle.superlink.net]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2000 1:37 PM
> >
> >
>   I spent some time today working on a solution to this that seems faster
(
> please check the benchmarks
> if you're interested ). It uses most of the same code David and several
> other people used, but it also makes
> use of some high school math for improving the speed.
>
> Advantages: 1) no word.downcase! call needed; 2) no word.sort! call
needed;
> 3) no key.push call needed
> ( in my solution, key is an integer, not an array )
>
> Disadvantages: my solution includes an ugly hash called asc2prime
>
> The idea is this: use the math theorem that upto order of the prime
factors,
> 'every positive integer can be written uniquely as a product of primes'.
To
> create an integer key for each word, I first setup a hash which maps ascii
> codes for a-z and A-Z to the first 26 primes. Then as I each_byte the
word,
> the key is built of the product of the
> primes associated with each letter in the word.
>
> Barry
> ---------
>
> require 'benchmark'
> include Benchmark
>
>  def barry(words)
>      asc2prime = { 65 => 2 , 66 => 3 , 67 => 5 , 68 => 7 , 69 => 11 ,
>                70 => 13, 71 => 17 , 72 => 19 , 73 => 23 , 74 => 29 ,
>                75 => 31, 76 => 37 , 77 => 41 , 78 => 43 , 79 => 47 , 80 =>
> 53 ,
>                81 => 59 , 82 => 61 , 83 => 67 , 84 => 71 , 85 => 73 , 86
=>
> 79 ,
>                87 => 83 , 88 => 89 , 89 => 97 , 90 => 101 ,
>                97 => 2 , 98 => 3 , 99 => 5 , 100 => 7 , 101 => 11 ,
>                102 => 13, 103 => 17 , 104 => 19 , 105 => 23 , 106 => 29 ,
>                107 => 31, 108 => 37 , 109 => 41 , 110 => 43 , 111 => 47 ,
> 112 => 53 ,
>                113 => 59 , 114 => 61 , 115 => 67 , 116 => 71 , 117 => 73 ,
> 118 => 79 ,
>                119 => 83 , 120 => 89 , 121 => 97 , 122 => 101
>                 }
>
>      anagrams = {}
>      keys = {}
>      word = nil
>      key = 0
>      total = 0
>      for word in words do
>        word.chomp!
>        key = 1
>        word.each_byte {|s| key *= asc2prime[s]}
Hm,

isn't something like

key = 0
word.each_byte do |s|
    key << 5  # multiply by 32
    if  s < 97
          key+= s - 64
    else
          key+= s - 96
    end
end

much simpler (and  faster)?

Christoph



In This Thread