[#6954] Why isn't Perl highly orthogonal? — Terrence Brannon <brannon@...>

27 messages 2000/12/09

[#7022] Re: Ruby in the US — Kevin Smith <kevinbsmith@...>

> Is it possible for the US to develop corporate

36 messages 2000/12/11
[#7633] Re: Ruby in the US — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/12/19

tonys@myspleenklug.on.ca (tony summerfelt) writes:

[#7636] Re: Ruby in the US — "Joseph McDonald" <joe@...> 2000/12/19

[#7704] Re: Ruby in the US — Jilani Khaldi <jilanik@...> 2000/12/19

> > first candidates would be mysql and postgressql because source is

[#7705] Code sample for improvement — Stephen White <steve@...> 2000/12/19

During an idle chat with someone on IRC, they presented some fairly

[#7750] Re: Code sample for improvement — "Guy N. Hurst" <gnhurst@...> 2000/12/20

Stephen White wrote:

[#7751] Re: Code sample for improvement — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/20

Hello --

[#7755] Re: Code sample for improvement — "Guy N. Hurst" <gnhurst@...> 2000/12/20

David Alan Black wrote:

[#7758] Re: Code sample for improvement — Stephen White <steve@...> 2000/12/20

On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Guy N. Hurst wrote:

[#7759] Next amusing problem: talking integers (was Re: Code sample for improvement) — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/20

On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Stephen White wrote:

[#7212] New User Survey: we need your opinions — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

16 messages 2000/12/14

[#7330] A Java Developer's Wish List for Ruby — "Richard A.Schulman" <RichardASchulman@...>

I see Ruby as having a very bright future as a language to

22 messages 2000/12/15

[#7354] Ruby performance question — Eric Crampton <EricCrampton@...>

I'm parsing simple text lines which look like this:

21 messages 2000/12/15
[#7361] Re: Ruby performance question — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/12/15

Eric Crampton <EricCrampton@worldnet.att.net> writes:

[#7367] Re: Ruby performance question — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/16

On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#7371] Re: Ruby performance question — "Joseph McDonald" <joe@...> 2000/12/16

[#7366] GUIs for Rubies — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Thought I'd switch the subject line to the subject at hand.

22 messages 2000/12/16

[#7416] Re: Ruby IDE (again) — Kevin Smith <kevins14@...>

>> >> I would contribute to this project, if it

17 messages 2000/12/16
[#7422] Re: Ruby IDE (again) — Holden Glova <dsafari@...> 2000/12/16

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[#7582] New to Ruby — takaoueda@...

I have just started learning Ruby with the book of Thomas and Hunt. The

24 messages 2000/12/18

[#7604] Any corrections for Programming Ruby — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

12 messages 2000/12/18

[#7737] strange border-case Numeric errors — "Brian F. Feldman" <green@...>

I haven't had a good enough chance to familiarize myself with the code in

19 messages 2000/12/20

[#7801] Is Ruby part of any standard GNU Linux distributions? — "Pete McBreen, McBreen.Consulting" <mcbreenp@...>

Anybody know what it would take to get Ruby into the standard GNU Linux

15 messages 2000/12/20

[#7938] Re: defined? problem? — Kevin Smith <sent@...>

matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) wrote:

26 messages 2000/12/22
[#7943] Re: defined? problem? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/12/22

Kevin Smith <sent@qualitycode.com> writes:

[#7950] Re: defined? problem? — Stephen White <steve@...> 2000/12/22

On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#7951] Re: defined? problem? — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/22

On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Stephen White wrote:

[#7954] Re: defined? problem? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/12/22

David Alan Black <dblack@candle.superlink.net> writes:

[#7975] Re: defined? problem? — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/22

Hello --

[#7971] Hash access method — Ted Meng <ted_meng@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2000/12/22

[#8030] Re: Basic hash question — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "B" == Ben Tilly <ben_tilly@hotmail.com> writes:

15 messages 2000/12/24
[#8033] Re: Basic hash question — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2000/12/24

On Sun, 24 Dec 2000, ts wrote:

[#8178] Inexplicable core dump — "Nathaniel Talbott" <ntalbott@...>

I have some code that looks like this:

12 messages 2000/12/28

[#8196] My first impression of Ruby. Lack of overloading? (long) — jmichel@... (Jean Michel)

Hello,

23 messages 2000/12/28

[#8198] Re: Ruby cron scheduler for NT available — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

John Small wrote:

14 messages 2000/12/28

[#8287] Re: speedup of anagram finder — "SHULTZ,BARRY (HP-Israel,ex1)" <barry_shultz@...>

> -----Original Message-----

12 messages 2000/12/29

[ruby-talk:7868] Re: Next amusing problem: talking integers (was Re: Code sample for improvement)

From: Stephen White <steve@...>
Date: 2000-12-21 14:43:56 UTC
List: ruby-talk #7868
On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, Kevin Smith wrote:

> > ones_names = '.one.two.three.four.five.six.seven.eight.nine.ten.
> > eleven.twelve.thirteen.fourteen.fifteen.sixteen.seventeen.
> > eighteen.nineteen'.split('.')
> 
> Nice way to set up an array of strings. I'll borrow it. It beats ['',
> 'one', 'two'...].

Here's another way:

  ones_names = %w(one two three four five six seven eight nine ten
                  eleven twelve thirteen fourteen fifteen sixteen
                  seventeeen eighteen nineteen)

> >  ['', 'thousand', 'million', 'billion', 'trillion'].map { |gstr|
> >    (num, group) = num.divmod (1000)

What's the difference between map and each here?

Here's my current version, taking in some of the improvements other
people have posted...

  #! /usr/bin/env ruby

  $t = {           10=>'ten',       0=>'zero',
    10=>'ten',     11=>'eleven',    1=>'one',
    20=>'twenty',  12=>'twelve',    2=>'two',
    30=>'thirty',  13=>'thirteen',  3=>'three',
    40=>'forty',   14=>'fourteen',  4=>'four',
    50=>'fifty',   15=>'fifteen',   5=>'five',
    60=>'sixty',   16=>'sixteen',   6=>'six',
    70=>'seventy', 17=>'seventeen', 7=>'seven',
    80=>'eighty',  18=>'eighteen',  8=>'eight',
    90=>'ninety',  19=>'nineteen',  9=>'nine'
  }

  def num2(num)
    $t.key?(num) ? $t[num] : $t[num/10*10]+' '+$t[num%10]
  end

  def num3(num)
    hi, lo = num/100, num%100

    if    hi > 0 && lo > 0 then "#{$t[hi]} hundred and #{num2(lo)}"
    elsif hi > 0           then "#{$t[hi]} hundred"
    else                        "#{num2(lo)}"
    end
  end

  def newnum(num)
    res = []

    ['', ' thousand', ' million', ' billion'].each {|name|
      if num%1000 != 0 then res << num3(num%1000)+name end
      num /= 1000
    }

    res.reverse.join(', ')
  end

  num = ARGV[0].to_i
  puts newnum(num)

-- 
  steve@deaf.org

In This Thread