[#6954] Why isn't Perl highly orthogonal? — Terrence Brannon <brannon@...>

27 messages 2000/12/09

[#7022] Re: Ruby in the US — Kevin Smith <kevinbsmith@...>

> Is it possible for the US to develop corporate

36 messages 2000/12/11
[#7633] Re: Ruby in the US — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/12/19

tonys@myspleenklug.on.ca (tony summerfelt) writes:

[#7636] Re: Ruby in the US — "Joseph McDonald" <joe@...> 2000/12/19

[#7704] Re: Ruby in the US — Jilani Khaldi <jilanik@...> 2000/12/19

> > first candidates would be mysql and postgressql because source is

[#7705] Code sample for improvement — Stephen White <steve@...> 2000/12/19

During an idle chat with someone on IRC, they presented some fairly

[#7750] Re: Code sample for improvement — "Guy N. Hurst" <gnhurst@...> 2000/12/20

Stephen White wrote:

[#7751] Re: Code sample for improvement — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/20

Hello --

[#7755] Re: Code sample for improvement — "Guy N. Hurst" <gnhurst@...> 2000/12/20

David Alan Black wrote:

[#7758] Re: Code sample for improvement — Stephen White <steve@...> 2000/12/20

On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Guy N. Hurst wrote:

[#7759] Next amusing problem: talking integers (was Re: Code sample for improvement) — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/20

On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Stephen White wrote:

[#7212] New User Survey: we need your opinions — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

16 messages 2000/12/14

[#7330] A Java Developer's Wish List for Ruby — "Richard A.Schulman" <RichardASchulman@...>

I see Ruby as having a very bright future as a language to

22 messages 2000/12/15

[#7354] Ruby performance question — Eric Crampton <EricCrampton@...>

I'm parsing simple text lines which look like this:

21 messages 2000/12/15
[#7361] Re: Ruby performance question — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/12/15

Eric Crampton <EricCrampton@worldnet.att.net> writes:

[#7367] Re: Ruby performance question — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/16

On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#7371] Re: Ruby performance question — "Joseph McDonald" <joe@...> 2000/12/16

[#7366] GUIs for Rubies — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Thought I'd switch the subject line to the subject at hand.

22 messages 2000/12/16

[#7416] Re: Ruby IDE (again) — Kevin Smith <kevins14@...>

>> >> I would contribute to this project, if it

17 messages 2000/12/16
[#7422] Re: Ruby IDE (again) — Holden Glova <dsafari@...> 2000/12/16

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[#7582] New to Ruby — takaoueda@...

I have just started learning Ruby with the book of Thomas and Hunt. The

24 messages 2000/12/18

[#7604] Any corrections for Programming Ruby — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

12 messages 2000/12/18

[#7737] strange border-case Numeric errors — "Brian F. Feldman" <green@...>

I haven't had a good enough chance to familiarize myself with the code in

19 messages 2000/12/20

[#7801] Is Ruby part of any standard GNU Linux distributions? — "Pete McBreen, McBreen.Consulting" <mcbreenp@...>

Anybody know what it would take to get Ruby into the standard GNU Linux

15 messages 2000/12/20

[#7938] Re: defined? problem? — Kevin Smith <sent@...>

matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) wrote:

26 messages 2000/12/22
[#7943] Re: defined? problem? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/12/22

Kevin Smith <sent@qualitycode.com> writes:

[#7950] Re: defined? problem? — Stephen White <steve@...> 2000/12/22

On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#7951] Re: defined? problem? — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/22

On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Stephen White wrote:

[#7954] Re: defined? problem? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/12/22

David Alan Black <dblack@candle.superlink.net> writes:

[#7975] Re: defined? problem? — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/22

Hello --

[#7971] Hash access method — Ted Meng <ted_meng@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2000/12/22

[#8030] Re: Basic hash question — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "B" == Ben Tilly <ben_tilly@hotmail.com> writes:

15 messages 2000/12/24
[#8033] Re: Basic hash question — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2000/12/24

On Sun, 24 Dec 2000, ts wrote:

[#8178] Inexplicable core dump — "Nathaniel Talbott" <ntalbott@...>

I have some code that looks like this:

12 messages 2000/12/28

[#8196] My first impression of Ruby. Lack of overloading? (long) — jmichel@... (Jean Michel)

Hello,

23 messages 2000/12/28

[#8198] Re: Ruby cron scheduler for NT available — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

John Small wrote:

14 messages 2000/12/28

[#8287] Re: speedup of anagram finder — "SHULTZ,BARRY (HP-Israel,ex1)" <barry_shultz@...>

> -----Original Message-----

12 messages 2000/12/29

[ruby-talk:7289] Re: more on the template system

From: "Joseph McDonald" <joe@...>
Date: 2000-12-15 06:29:09 UTC
List: ruby-talk #7289
Thanks Christoph,

Yes, I found the way to make singleton methods. It is
by using object.instance_eval(string)

As for avoiding namespace pollution, yes, I really
do want to avoid that.  This is why the actual created
methods live in the class of JotsOutput, while the
template processing class itself is different (Jots).

The only real kicker I have left is to figure out
a way to ignore errors where strings contain
variables that have not been defined.

i.e.:
puts "hello #{not_yet_defined_var}"
should print out:
"hello \n"
instead of just raising an exception.

In perl for instance you can:

no strict;
print "hello $not_yet_defined_var\n";

and it will print:
"hello \n"

thanks,
-joe

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christoph Rippel [mailto:crippel@primenet.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2000 10:13 PM
> To: ruby-talk ML
> Subject: [ruby-talk:7286] RE: more on the template system
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Joseph McDonald [mailto:joe@vpop.net]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2000 03:40 PM
> > To: ruby-talk ML
> > Subject: [ruby-talk:7263] more on the template system
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Here is a rough outline of what I am thinking of:
> > 
> > snippet1 = <<'EOF'
> >   def output
> >     puts "I am snippet1 var is: #{var}"
> >     puts var2.inspect
> >     puts "joe"
> >   end
> > EOF
> > 
> > snippet2 = <<'EOF'
> >   def output
> >     puts "I am snippet2 var is: #{var}"
> >     puts var2.inspect
> >   end
> > EOF
> I think you need to replace this with
> #####
> snippet1 = <<'EOF'
> class Jots
>    def output
>      puts "I am snippet1 var is: #{var}"
>      puts var2.inspect
>      puts "joe"
>    end
> end
> EOF
> 
> snippet2 = <<'EOF'
> class Jots 
>    def output
>      puts "I am snippet2 var is: #{var}"
>      puts var2.inspect
>    end
> end
> EOF
> ####
> I am also not quite sure if not better served
> with a singlteon construction
> 
> t1 = Jots.new
> def t1.output
>      puts "I am snippet1 var is: #{var}"
>      puts var2.inspect
>      puts "joe"
> end
> 
> You can automated this if you really want too along the line ..
> (you can also automate adding new ``Snippets'')
> 
> 
> class Jots   ## avoid name pollotion
> module Snippet1
>   def output
>      puts "I am snippet1 var is: #{var}"
>      puts var2.inspect
>      puts "joe"
>    end
> end
> module Snippet2
>    def output
>      puts "I am snippet2 var is: #{var}"
>      puts var2.inspect
>    end
> end
> def  Jots.with_output(s)
>      t = Jots.new 
>      case s
>          when "Snippet1"
>         		t.extend(Jots::Snippet1)
>          when "Snippet2"
> 		      t.extend(Jots::Snippet2)
>          else 
> 		# do nothing
>       end
> end
> end 
> 

In This Thread