[#6954] Why isn't Perl highly orthogonal? — Terrence Brannon <brannon@...>

27 messages 2000/12/09

[#7022] Re: Ruby in the US — Kevin Smith <kevinbsmith@...>

> Is it possible for the US to develop corporate

36 messages 2000/12/11
[#7633] Re: Ruby in the US — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/12/19

tonys@myspleenklug.on.ca (tony summerfelt) writes:

[#7636] Re: Ruby in the US — "Joseph McDonald" <joe@...> 2000/12/19

[#7704] Re: Ruby in the US — Jilani Khaldi <jilanik@...> 2000/12/19

> > first candidates would be mysql and postgressql because source is

[#7705] Code sample for improvement — Stephen White <steve@...> 2000/12/19

During an idle chat with someone on IRC, they presented some fairly

[#7750] Re: Code sample for improvement — "Guy N. Hurst" <gnhurst@...> 2000/12/20

Stephen White wrote:

[#7751] Re: Code sample for improvement — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/20

Hello --

[#7755] Re: Code sample for improvement — "Guy N. Hurst" <gnhurst@...> 2000/12/20

David Alan Black wrote:

[#7758] Re: Code sample for improvement — Stephen White <steve@...> 2000/12/20

On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Guy N. Hurst wrote:

[#7759] Next amusing problem: talking integers (was Re: Code sample for improvement) — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/20

On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Stephen White wrote:

[#7212] New User Survey: we need your opinions — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

16 messages 2000/12/14

[#7330] A Java Developer's Wish List for Ruby — "Richard A.Schulman" <RichardASchulman@...>

I see Ruby as having a very bright future as a language to

22 messages 2000/12/15

[#7354] Ruby performance question — Eric Crampton <EricCrampton@...>

I'm parsing simple text lines which look like this:

21 messages 2000/12/15
[#7361] Re: Ruby performance question — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/12/15

Eric Crampton <EricCrampton@worldnet.att.net> writes:

[#7367] Re: Ruby performance question — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/16

On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#7371] Re: Ruby performance question — "Joseph McDonald" <joe@...> 2000/12/16

[#7366] GUIs for Rubies — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Thought I'd switch the subject line to the subject at hand.

22 messages 2000/12/16

[#7416] Re: Ruby IDE (again) — Kevin Smith <kevins14@...>

>> >> I would contribute to this project, if it

17 messages 2000/12/16
[#7422] Re: Ruby IDE (again) — Holden Glova <dsafari@...> 2000/12/16

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[#7582] New to Ruby — takaoueda@...

I have just started learning Ruby with the book of Thomas and Hunt. The

24 messages 2000/12/18

[#7604] Any corrections for Programming Ruby — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

12 messages 2000/12/18

[#7737] strange border-case Numeric errors — "Brian F. Feldman" <green@...>

I haven't had a good enough chance to familiarize myself with the code in

19 messages 2000/12/20

[#7801] Is Ruby part of any standard GNU Linux distributions? — "Pete McBreen, McBreen.Consulting" <mcbreenp@...>

Anybody know what it would take to get Ruby into the standard GNU Linux

15 messages 2000/12/20

[#7938] Re: defined? problem? — Kevin Smith <sent@...>

matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) wrote:

26 messages 2000/12/22
[#7943] Re: defined? problem? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/12/22

Kevin Smith <sent@qualitycode.com> writes:

[#7950] Re: defined? problem? — Stephen White <steve@...> 2000/12/22

On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#7951] Re: defined? problem? — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/22

On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Stephen White wrote:

[#7954] Re: defined? problem? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/12/22

David Alan Black <dblack@candle.superlink.net> writes:

[#7975] Re: defined? problem? — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/22

Hello --

[#7971] Hash access method — Ted Meng <ted_meng@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2000/12/22

[#8030] Re: Basic hash question — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "B" == Ben Tilly <ben_tilly@hotmail.com> writes:

15 messages 2000/12/24
[#8033] Re: Basic hash question — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2000/12/24

On Sun, 24 Dec 2000, ts wrote:

[#8178] Inexplicable core dump — "Nathaniel Talbott" <ntalbott@...>

I have some code that looks like this:

12 messages 2000/12/28

[#8196] My first impression of Ruby. Lack of overloading? (long) — jmichel@... (Jean Michel)

Hello,

23 messages 2000/12/28

[#8198] Re: Ruby cron scheduler for NT available — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

John Small wrote:

14 messages 2000/12/28

[#8287] Re: speedup of anagram finder — "SHULTZ,BARRY (HP-Israel,ex1)" <barry_shultz@...>

> -----Original Message-----

12 messages 2000/12/29

[ruby-talk:8372] Re: speedup of anagram finder

From: David Alan Black <dblack@...>
Date: 2000-12-30 20:39:43 UTC
List: ruby-talk #8372
Hello --

On Sun, 31 Dec 2000, SHULTZ,BARRY (HP-Israel,ex1) wrote:

> Hi David,
>
> I saw your post about checking the benchmarks. Could my
> wordlist.txt somehow favor my implementation?

Could be: see below.

> I wonder. Could you try benchmarking prime2 and tell me how
> that compares?
> 
>  Here's prime2. Improvements: 1) ugly array instead of ugly hash asc2prime
>  2) use your trick to eliminate line: keys[key] = 1. I'm still a newbie;
>  it took me a while to figure out what << (keys[key] = word) does.

Funny -- I actually went back to the two-line version (slightly
faster, I think).  But I'll benchmark with the sly, side-effect-based
technique :-)  (I'm just using second-round results, to save space.)

		   user     system      total        real
   prime2      3.170000   0.000000   3.170000 (  3.166510)
   primes      3.190000   0.000000   3.190000 (  3.191548)
   unpack      2.590000   0.000000   2.590000 (  2.594617)

Compared with yours:

> prime2      1.622000   0.000000   1.622000 (  1.622000)
> primes      1.643000   0.000000   1.643000 (  1.642000)
> unpack      1.722000   0.000000   1.722000 (  1.723000)
> 

I think that this may indeed come down to the lengths of the words.
When I use a file of all five-letter words, I get:

		   user     system      total        real
   primes      2.410000   0.000000   2.410000 (  2.406790)
   prime2      2.380000   0.000000   2.380000 (  2.379698)
   unpack      3.280000   0.010000   3.290000 (  3.289801)

So perhaps we should synchronize our word lists and see what happens.

Meanwhile, another thing that might be useful here is generalizing the
creation of the prime number array or hash:

   require 'mathn'

   pr = [*0...26]
   p = Prime.new
   primes = pr.map do p.next end

   $asc2prime = {}
   for n in [65,97] do
     pr.each do |x| $asc2prime[x + n] = primes[x] end
   end

or something.  This is probably best done outside the anagram method
(hence the global $asc2prime).

> Stay warm,
> 
>  Barry, not snowbound ( in fact, my family and I were in a park
> flower-gazing today )

It's letting up a bit.  I can see the rear-view mirror of my car
poking up out of the snow.  The funny part is that my cousins from
Texas are visiting, and are now marooned at a Motel 6.


David

-- 
David Alan Black
home: dblack@candle.superlink.net
work: blackdav@shu.edu
Web:  http://pirate.shu.edu/~blackdav


In This Thread

Prev Next