[#6954] Why isn't Perl highly orthogonal? — Terrence Brannon <brannon@...>

27 messages 2000/12/09

[#7022] Re: Ruby in the US — Kevin Smith <kevinbsmith@...>

> Is it possible for the US to develop corporate

36 messages 2000/12/11
[#7633] Re: Ruby in the US — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/12/19

tonys@myspleenklug.on.ca (tony summerfelt) writes:

[#7636] Re: Ruby in the US — "Joseph McDonald" <joe@...> 2000/12/19

[#7704] Re: Ruby in the US — Jilani Khaldi <jilanik@...> 2000/12/19

> > first candidates would be mysql and postgressql because source is

[#7705] Code sample for improvement — Stephen White <steve@...> 2000/12/19

During an idle chat with someone on IRC, they presented some fairly

[#7750] Re: Code sample for improvement — "Guy N. Hurst" <gnhurst@...> 2000/12/20

Stephen White wrote:

[#7751] Re: Code sample for improvement — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/20

Hello --

[#7755] Re: Code sample for improvement — "Guy N. Hurst" <gnhurst@...> 2000/12/20

David Alan Black wrote:

[#7758] Re: Code sample for improvement — Stephen White <steve@...> 2000/12/20

On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Guy N. Hurst wrote:

[#7759] Next amusing problem: talking integers (was Re: Code sample for improvement) — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/20

On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Stephen White wrote:

[#7212] New User Survey: we need your opinions — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

16 messages 2000/12/14

[#7330] A Java Developer's Wish List for Ruby — "Richard A.Schulman" <RichardASchulman@...>

I see Ruby as having a very bright future as a language to

22 messages 2000/12/15

[#7354] Ruby performance question — Eric Crampton <EricCrampton@...>

I'm parsing simple text lines which look like this:

21 messages 2000/12/15
[#7361] Re: Ruby performance question — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/12/15

Eric Crampton <EricCrampton@worldnet.att.net> writes:

[#7367] Re: Ruby performance question — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/16

On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#7371] Re: Ruby performance question — "Joseph McDonald" <joe@...> 2000/12/16

[#7366] GUIs for Rubies — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Thought I'd switch the subject line to the subject at hand.

22 messages 2000/12/16

[#7416] Re: Ruby IDE (again) — Kevin Smith <kevins14@...>

>> >> I would contribute to this project, if it

17 messages 2000/12/16
[#7422] Re: Ruby IDE (again) — Holden Glova <dsafari@...> 2000/12/16

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[#7582] New to Ruby — takaoueda@...

I have just started learning Ruby with the book of Thomas and Hunt. The

24 messages 2000/12/18

[#7604] Any corrections for Programming Ruby — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

12 messages 2000/12/18

[#7737] strange border-case Numeric errors — "Brian F. Feldman" <green@...>

I haven't had a good enough chance to familiarize myself with the code in

19 messages 2000/12/20

[#7801] Is Ruby part of any standard GNU Linux distributions? — "Pete McBreen, McBreen.Consulting" <mcbreenp@...>

Anybody know what it would take to get Ruby into the standard GNU Linux

15 messages 2000/12/20

[#7938] Re: defined? problem? — Kevin Smith <sent@...>

matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) wrote:

26 messages 2000/12/22
[#7943] Re: defined? problem? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/12/22

Kevin Smith <sent@qualitycode.com> writes:

[#7950] Re: defined? problem? — Stephen White <steve@...> 2000/12/22

On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#7951] Re: defined? problem? — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/22

On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Stephen White wrote:

[#7954] Re: defined? problem? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/12/22

David Alan Black <dblack@candle.superlink.net> writes:

[#7975] Re: defined? problem? — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/22

Hello --

[#7971] Hash access method — Ted Meng <ted_meng@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2000/12/22

[#8030] Re: Basic hash question — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "B" == Ben Tilly <ben_tilly@hotmail.com> writes:

15 messages 2000/12/24
[#8033] Re: Basic hash question — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2000/12/24

On Sun, 24 Dec 2000, ts wrote:

[#8178] Inexplicable core dump — "Nathaniel Talbott" <ntalbott@...>

I have some code that looks like this:

12 messages 2000/12/28

[#8196] My first impression of Ruby. Lack of overloading? (long) — jmichel@... (Jean Michel)

Hello,

23 messages 2000/12/28

[#8198] Re: Ruby cron scheduler for NT available — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

John Small wrote:

14 messages 2000/12/28

[#8287] Re: speedup of anagram finder — "SHULTZ,BARRY (HP-Israel,ex1)" <barry_shultz@...>

> -----Original Message-----

12 messages 2000/12/29

[ruby-talk:7279] Re: Ruby in the US

From: "Ben Tilly" <ben_tilly@...>
Date: 2000-12-15 04:45:49 UTC
List: ruby-talk #7279
matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>In message "[ruby-talk:7238] Re: Ruby in the US"
>     on 00/12/15, "Ben Tilly" <ben_tilly@hotmail.com> writes:
>
>|>It does contains COPYING.LIB file in it.
>|>Probably I should make description better.
>|
>|I read that.  It was clear to me.  But it doesn't look like
>|it satisfied the very specific requirement in the LGPL that
>|the license be distributed.
>
>Could you explain what I should have done, please?
>I'm not good at reading this license like stuff.

As someone else pointed out, I misread the situation
somewhat.  IANAL but you should definitely rename COPYING
back to GPL.  Rename COPYING.LIB to LGPL.  Try to get some
statement of copyright licenses for the other two copyright
holders in gc.c.  I won't address questions about your
Artistic License.  (I suspect that switching to a BSD style
license would be a good fit for you.)  However I am
attaching two patches which I think would be good.

Note that I didn't want to list licenses in README, but I
think it has to be done for regex.[ch] for section 6 of the
LGPL, and if you do it for that, it looks strange not to do
it for all of them.

Cheers,
Ben

PS I fear that the the second will be ruined by line
wrapping.

--- missing/vsnprintf.c.bak     Thu Dec 14 11:54:16 2000
+++ missing/vsnprintf.c Thu Dec 14 11:57:51 2000
@@ -34,6 +34,13 @@
  * SUCH DAMAGE.
  */

+/*
+ * IMPORTANT NOTE:
+ * --------------
+ * From ftp://ftp.cs.berkeley.edu/pub/4bsd/README.Impt.License.Change
+ * paragraph 3 above is now null and void.
+ */
+
/* SNPRINTF.C
  * fjc 7-31-97 Modified by Mib Software to be a standalone snprintf.c 
module.
  *      http://www.mibsoftware.com


bash-2.01$ diff -u README{.bak,}
--- README.bak  Thu Dec 14 11:37:51 2000
+++ README      Thu Dec 14 12:22:13 2000
@@ -75,8 +75,8 @@
* Copying

Ruby is copyrighted free software by Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@zetabits.com>.
-You can redistribute it and/or modify it under either the terms of the GPL
-(see COPYING file), or the conditions below:
+You can redistribute and/or modify the parts written by the author under
+either the terms of the GPL, or the conditions below:

   1. You may make and give away verbatim copies of the source form of the
      software without restriction, provided that you duplicate all of the
@@ -113,13 +113,8 @@

        d) make other distribution arrangements with the author.

-  4. You may modify and include the part of the software into any other
-     software (possibly commercial).  But some files in the distribution
-     are not written by the author, so that they are not under this terms.
-
-     They are gc.c(partly), utils.c(partly), regex.[ch], st.[ch] and some
-     files under the ./missing directory.  See each file for the copying
-     condition.
+  4. You may modify and include any part of the software into any other
+     software (possibly commercial).

   5. The scripts and library files supplied as input to or produced as
      output from the software do not automatically fall under the
@@ -131,6 +126,10 @@
      IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THE IMPLIED
      WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
      PURPOSE.
+
+The files in whole or part not written by the author are gc.c (???),
+util.c (GPL or Artistic License), regex.[ch] (LGPL), st.[ch] (public
+domain) and various files under ./missing.

* Ruby home-page

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

In This Thread

Prev Next