[#6954] Why isn't Perl highly orthogonal? — Terrence Brannon <brannon@...>

27 messages 2000/12/09

[#7022] Re: Ruby in the US — Kevin Smith <kevinbsmith@...>

> Is it possible for the US to develop corporate

36 messages 2000/12/11
[#7633] Re: Ruby in the US — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/12/19

tonys@myspleenklug.on.ca (tony summerfelt) writes:

[#7636] Re: Ruby in the US — "Joseph McDonald" <joe@...> 2000/12/19

[#7704] Re: Ruby in the US — Jilani Khaldi <jilanik@...> 2000/12/19

> > first candidates would be mysql and postgressql because source is

[#7705] Code sample for improvement — Stephen White <steve@...> 2000/12/19

During an idle chat with someone on IRC, they presented some fairly

[#7750] Re: Code sample for improvement — "Guy N. Hurst" <gnhurst@...> 2000/12/20

Stephen White wrote:

[#7751] Re: Code sample for improvement — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/20

Hello --

[#7755] Re: Code sample for improvement — "Guy N. Hurst" <gnhurst@...> 2000/12/20

David Alan Black wrote:

[#7758] Re: Code sample for improvement — Stephen White <steve@...> 2000/12/20

On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Guy N. Hurst wrote:

[#7759] Next amusing problem: talking integers (was Re: Code sample for improvement) — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/20

On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Stephen White wrote:

[#7212] New User Survey: we need your opinions — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

16 messages 2000/12/14

[#7330] A Java Developer's Wish List for Ruby — "Richard A.Schulman" <RichardASchulman@...>

I see Ruby as having a very bright future as a language to

22 messages 2000/12/15

[#7354] Ruby performance question — Eric Crampton <EricCrampton@...>

I'm parsing simple text lines which look like this:

21 messages 2000/12/15
[#7361] Re: Ruby performance question — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/12/15

Eric Crampton <EricCrampton@worldnet.att.net> writes:

[#7367] Re: Ruby performance question — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/16

On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#7371] Re: Ruby performance question — "Joseph McDonald" <joe@...> 2000/12/16

[#7366] GUIs for Rubies — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Thought I'd switch the subject line to the subject at hand.

22 messages 2000/12/16

[#7416] Re: Ruby IDE (again) — Kevin Smith <kevins14@...>

>> >> I would contribute to this project, if it

17 messages 2000/12/16
[#7422] Re: Ruby IDE (again) — Holden Glova <dsafari@...> 2000/12/16

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[#7582] New to Ruby — takaoueda@...

I have just started learning Ruby with the book of Thomas and Hunt. The

24 messages 2000/12/18

[#7604] Any corrections for Programming Ruby — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

12 messages 2000/12/18

[#7737] strange border-case Numeric errors — "Brian F. Feldman" <green@...>

I haven't had a good enough chance to familiarize myself with the code in

19 messages 2000/12/20

[#7801] Is Ruby part of any standard GNU Linux distributions? — "Pete McBreen, McBreen.Consulting" <mcbreenp@...>

Anybody know what it would take to get Ruby into the standard GNU Linux

15 messages 2000/12/20

[#7938] Re: defined? problem? — Kevin Smith <sent@...>

matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) wrote:

26 messages 2000/12/22
[#7943] Re: defined? problem? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/12/22

Kevin Smith <sent@qualitycode.com> writes:

[#7950] Re: defined? problem? — Stephen White <steve@...> 2000/12/22

On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#7951] Re: defined? problem? — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/22

On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Stephen White wrote:

[#7954] Re: defined? problem? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/12/22

David Alan Black <dblack@candle.superlink.net> writes:

[#7975] Re: defined? problem? — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/22

Hello --

[#7971] Hash access method — Ted Meng <ted_meng@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2000/12/22

[#8030] Re: Basic hash question — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "B" == Ben Tilly <ben_tilly@hotmail.com> writes:

15 messages 2000/12/24
[#8033] Re: Basic hash question — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2000/12/24

On Sun, 24 Dec 2000, ts wrote:

[#8178] Inexplicable core dump — "Nathaniel Talbott" <ntalbott@...>

I have some code that looks like this:

12 messages 2000/12/28

[#8196] My first impression of Ruby. Lack of overloading? (long) — jmichel@... (Jean Michel)

Hello,

23 messages 2000/12/28

[#8198] Re: Ruby cron scheduler for NT available — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

John Small wrote:

14 messages 2000/12/28

[#8287] Re: speedup of anagram finder — "SHULTZ,BARRY (HP-Israel,ex1)" <barry_shultz@...>

> -----Original Message-----

12 messages 2000/12/29

[ruby-talk:8370] Re: speedup of anagram finder

From: "SHULTZ,BARRY (HP-Israel,ex1)" <barry_shultz@...>
Date: 2000-12-30 20:04:31 UTC
List: ruby-talk #8370
Hi David,
 I saw your post about checking the benchmarks. Could my wordlist.txt
somehow favor my 
implementation? I wonder. Could you try benchmarking prime2 and tell me how
that compares?

 Here's prime2. Improvements: 1) ugly array instead of ugly hash asc2prime
 2) use your trick to eliminate line: keys[key] = 1. I'm still a newbie;
 it took me a while to figure out what << (keys[key] = word) does.
 
 And in general, I do not understand how calls to dup, downcase!, pack,
sort! and unpack
can be faster than multiplying array ( was 'hash' ) entries during an
each_byte iteration. 
It just seems that they're heavier calculations. That's my intuition, but
can any of the more 
experienced Rubyists comment on that?
 
Stay warm,

 Barry, not snowbound ( in fact, my family and I were in a park
flower-gazing today )

require 'benchmark'
include Benchmark
     
    def prime2(words)
        asc2prime = [0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,
                     0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,
                     0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,
                     0,0,0,0,0,2,3,5,7,11,13,17,19,23,29,31,37,
                     41,43,47,53,59,61,67,71,73,79,83,89,97,101,
                     0,0,0,0,0,0,2,3,5,7,11,13,17,19,23,29,31,37,
                     41,43,47,53,59,61,67,71,73,79,83,89,97,101
                     ]
             
   
        anagrams = {}
        keys = {}
        word = nil
        key = 0
        total = 0
   
        for word in words do
          word.chomp!
          key = 1
          word.each_byte {|s| key *= asc2prime[s]}
          if anagrams[key]
   	 anagrams[key] << (keys[key] = word)
   	 #keys[key] = 1
          else
   	 anagrams[key] = [ word ]
          end
        end
#       for key in keys.keys
#         puts anagrams[key].join(' ')
#       end
      end

   
   def unpack(words)
     anagrams, keys, word, key = {}, {}
     for word in words do
       word.chomp!
       key = word.dup
       key.downcase!
       chars = key.unpack('c*')
       chars.sort!
       key = chars.pack('c*')
       if anagrams[key]
	 anagrams[key] << (keys[key] = word)
       else
	 anagrams[key] = [ word ]
       end
     end
   end
 
 
bm(10) do |x|
  GC.start
  x.report("prime2"){prime2(wordlist)  }
  GC.start
  x.report("primes"){barry(wordlist)}
  GC.start
  x.report("unpack"){unpack(wordlist)  }
  GC.start
  x.report("prime2"){prime2(wordlist)  }
  GC.start
  x.report("primes"){barry(wordlist)}
  GC.start
  x.report("unpack"){unpack(wordlist)  }
end

******************************************************
                user     system      total        real
prime2      1.873000   0.000000   1.873000 (  1.873000)
primes      1.722000   0.000000   1.722000 (  1.723000)
unpack      1.953000   0.000000   1.953000 (  1.952000)
prime2      1.622000   0.000000   1.622000 (  1.622000)
primes      1.643000   0.000000   1.643000 (  1.642000)
unpack      1.722000   0.000000   1.722000 (  1.723000)

In This Thread

Prev Next