[#6954] Why isn't Perl highly orthogonal? — Terrence Brannon <brannon@...>

27 messages 2000/12/09

[#7022] Re: Ruby in the US — Kevin Smith <kevinbsmith@...>

> Is it possible for the US to develop corporate

36 messages 2000/12/11
[#7633] Re: Ruby in the US — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/12/19

tonys@myspleenklug.on.ca (tony summerfelt) writes:

[#7636] Re: Ruby in the US — "Joseph McDonald" <joe@...> 2000/12/19

[#7704] Re: Ruby in the US — Jilani Khaldi <jilanik@...> 2000/12/19

> > first candidates would be mysql and postgressql because source is

[#7705] Code sample for improvement — Stephen White <steve@...> 2000/12/19

During an idle chat with someone on IRC, they presented some fairly

[#7750] Re: Code sample for improvement — "Guy N. Hurst" <gnhurst@...> 2000/12/20

Stephen White wrote:

[#7751] Re: Code sample for improvement — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/20

Hello --

[#7755] Re: Code sample for improvement — "Guy N. Hurst" <gnhurst@...> 2000/12/20

David Alan Black wrote:

[#7758] Re: Code sample for improvement — Stephen White <steve@...> 2000/12/20

On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Guy N. Hurst wrote:

[#7759] Next amusing problem: talking integers (was Re: Code sample for improvement) — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/20

On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Stephen White wrote:

[#7212] New User Survey: we need your opinions — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

16 messages 2000/12/14

[#7330] A Java Developer's Wish List for Ruby — "Richard A.Schulman" <RichardASchulman@...>

I see Ruby as having a very bright future as a language to

22 messages 2000/12/15

[#7354] Ruby performance question — Eric Crampton <EricCrampton@...>

I'm parsing simple text lines which look like this:

21 messages 2000/12/15
[#7361] Re: Ruby performance question — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/12/15

Eric Crampton <EricCrampton@worldnet.att.net> writes:

[#7367] Re: Ruby performance question — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/16

On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#7371] Re: Ruby performance question — "Joseph McDonald" <joe@...> 2000/12/16

[#7366] GUIs for Rubies — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Thought I'd switch the subject line to the subject at hand.

22 messages 2000/12/16

[#7416] Re: Ruby IDE (again) — Kevin Smith <kevins14@...>

>> >> I would contribute to this project, if it

17 messages 2000/12/16
[#7422] Re: Ruby IDE (again) — Holden Glova <dsafari@...> 2000/12/16

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[#7582] New to Ruby — takaoueda@...

I have just started learning Ruby with the book of Thomas and Hunt. The

24 messages 2000/12/18

[#7604] Any corrections for Programming Ruby — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

12 messages 2000/12/18

[#7737] strange border-case Numeric errors — "Brian F. Feldman" <green@...>

I haven't had a good enough chance to familiarize myself with the code in

19 messages 2000/12/20

[#7801] Is Ruby part of any standard GNU Linux distributions? — "Pete McBreen, McBreen.Consulting" <mcbreenp@...>

Anybody know what it would take to get Ruby into the standard GNU Linux

15 messages 2000/12/20

[#7938] Re: defined? problem? — Kevin Smith <sent@...>

matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) wrote:

26 messages 2000/12/22
[#7943] Re: defined? problem? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/12/22

Kevin Smith <sent@qualitycode.com> writes:

[#7950] Re: defined? problem? — Stephen White <steve@...> 2000/12/22

On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#7951] Re: defined? problem? — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/22

On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Stephen White wrote:

[#7954] Re: defined? problem? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/12/22

David Alan Black <dblack@candle.superlink.net> writes:

[#7975] Re: defined? problem? — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/12/22

Hello --

[#7971] Hash access method — Ted Meng <ted_meng@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2000/12/22

[#8030] Re: Basic hash question — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "B" == Ben Tilly <ben_tilly@hotmail.com> writes:

15 messages 2000/12/24
[#8033] Re: Basic hash question — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2000/12/24

On Sun, 24 Dec 2000, ts wrote:

[#8178] Inexplicable core dump — "Nathaniel Talbott" <ntalbott@...>

I have some code that looks like this:

12 messages 2000/12/28

[#8196] My first impression of Ruby. Lack of overloading? (long) — jmichel@... (Jean Michel)

Hello,

23 messages 2000/12/28

[#8198] Re: Ruby cron scheduler for NT available — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

John Small wrote:

14 messages 2000/12/28

[#8287] Re: speedup of anagram finder — "SHULTZ,BARRY (HP-Israel,ex1)" <barry_shultz@...>

> -----Original Message-----

12 messages 2000/12/29

[ruby-talk:7695] Re: Ruby/FOX

From: "Lyle Johnson" <ljohnson@...>
Date: 2000-12-19 15:40:03 UTC
List: ruby-talk #7695
Conrad,

Thanks for the information. I'm forwarding this to Jeroen and the
foxgui-users mailing list; hopefully he can get this patch into the next
drop.

Lyle

"Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@us.ibm.com> wrote in message
news:OFFAAA2389.6E190579-ON852569BA.000E4B79@raleigh.ibm.com...
> In case a Ruby/FOX is forthcoming, here is some early build feedback.
>
> In order to get configure to run on AIX 4.3, I had to add xlC to the list
> of potential C++ compilers:
>
> # diff configure configure.orig
> 1171,1172c1171
> < ### for ac_prog in $CCC c++ g++ gcc CC cxx cc++ cl
> < for ac_prog in $CCC c++ g++ gcc CC cxx cc++ cl xlC
> ---
> > for ac_prog in $CCC c++ g++ gcc CC cxx cc++ cl
>
> A lot of stuff compiled before I ran into this error:
>
> xlC -DPACKAGE=\"fox\" -DVERSION=\"0.99.147\" -DWORDS_BIGENDIAN=1
> -DTIME_WITH_SYS_TIME=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 -DHAVE_DIRENT_H=1
> -DHAVE_SYS_PARAM_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_SELECT_H=1 -I. -I. -I../include
> -I../include -DHAVE_XSHM -DHAVE_VSNPRINTF=1 -c  -DPIC FXColorNames.cpp -o
> FXColorNames.lo
> "FXColorNames.cpp", line 745.10: 1540-0274 (S) The name lookup for
> "comparecase" did not find a declaration.
> "../include/FXString.h", line 268.22: 1540-1298 (I) "FXint
> comparecase(const FXString &, const FXString &, FXint)" needs to be
> declared in the containing scope to be found by name lookup.
> "../include/FXString.h", line 267.22: 1540-1298 (I) "FXint
> comparecase(const FXString &, const FXchar *, FXint)" needs to be declared
> in the containing scope to be found by name lookup.
> "../include/FXString.h", line 266.22: 1540-1298 (I) "FXint
> comparecase(const FXchar *, const FXString &, FXint)" needs to be declared
> in the containing scope to be found by name lookup.
> "../include/FXString.h", line 265.22: 1540-1298 (I) "FXint
> comparecase(const FXchar *, const FXchar *, FXint)" needs to be declared
> in the containing scope to be found by name lookup.
> "../include/FXString.h", line 262.22: 1540-1298 (I) "FXint
> comparecase(const FXString &, const FXString &)" needs to be declared in
> the containing scope to be found by name lookup.
> "../include/FXString.h", line 261.22: 1540-1298 (I) "FXint
> comparecase(const FXString &, const FXchar *)" needs to be declared in the
> containing scope to be found by name lookup.
> "../include/FXString.h", line 260.22: 1540-1298 (I) "FXint
> comparecase(const FXchar *, const FXString &)" needs to be declared in the
> containing scope to be found by name lookup.
> "../include/FXString.h", line 259.22: 1540-1298 (I) "FXint
> comparecase(const FXchar *, const FXchar *)" needs to be declared in the
> containing scope to be found by name lookup.
> make[1]: *** [FXColorNames.lo] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/driver/tools/src/fox/fox-0.99.147/src'
> make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
>
> Conrad Schneiker
> (This note is unofficial and subject to improvement without notice.)


In This Thread

Prev Next