[#8566] Visions for 2001/1.7.x development? — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi matz and other Ruby developers,

18 messages 2001/01/03
[#8645] Re: Visions for 2001/1.7.x development? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/01/04

Hi,

[#8580] bug?? — jmichel@... (Jean Michel)

I don't understand the following behaviour:

19 messages 2001/01/03

[#8633] Interesting Language performance comparisons - Ruby, OCAML etc — "g forever" <g24ever@...>

13 messages 2001/01/04

[#8774] No :<, :>, etc. methods for Array — "Brian F. Feldman" <green@...>

So, why not include Comparable in Array by default? It shouldn't have any

28 messages 2001/01/07
[#8779] Re: No :<, :>, etc. methods for Array — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/01/07

Hi,

[#8780] Re: No :<, :>, etc. methods for Array — "Brian F. Feldman" <green@...> 2001/01/07

matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) wrote:

[#8781] Re: No :<, :>, etc. methods for Array — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 2001/01/07

In message "[ruby-talk:8780] Re: No :<, :>, etc. methods for Array"

[#8782] Re: No :<, :>, etc. methods for Array — "Brian F. Feldman" <green@...> 2001/01/07

gotoken@math.sci.hokudai.ac.jp (GOTO Kentaro) wrote:

[#8829] Sandbox (again) — wys@... (Clemens Wyss)

Hi,

20 messages 2001/01/08
[#8864] Re: Sandbox (again) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 2001/01/08

On 8 Jan, Clemens Wyss wrote:

[#8931] String confusion — Anders Bengtsson <ndrsbngtssn@...>

Hello everyone,

21 messages 2001/01/09
[#8937] Re: String confusion — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/01/09

Hi,

[#8953] Please remove account from files — "Thomas Daniels" <westernporter@...>

Please take my e-mail address from your files and "CANCEL" my =

14 messages 2001/01/09
[#8983] Re: Please remove account from files — John Rubinubi <rubinubi@...> 2001/01/10

On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Thomas Daniels wrote:

[#9020] time to divide -talk? (was: Please remove account from files) — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2001/01/10

At Wed, 10 Jan 2001 14:23:30 +0900,

[#9047] Re: time to divide -talk? (was: Please remov e account from files) — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

Yasushi Shoji:

27 messages 2001/01/10
[#9049] Re: time to divide -talk? — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2001/01/10

At Thu, 11 Jan 2001 00:20:45 +0900,

[#9153] what about this begin? — Anders Strandl Elkj誡 <ase@...> 2001/01/11

[#9195] Re: Redefining singleton methods — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "H" == Horst Duch=EAne?= <iso-8859-1> writes:

10 messages 2001/01/12

[#9242] polymorphism — Maurice Szmurlo <maurice@...>

hello

73 messages 2001/01/13

[#9279] Can ruby replace php? — Jim Freeze <jim@...>

When I read that ruby could be used to replace PHP I got really

15 messages 2001/01/14

[#9411] The Ruby Way — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

As a member of the "Big 8" newsgroups, "The Ruby Way" (of posting) is to

15 messages 2001/01/17

[#9462] Re: reading an entire file as a string — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "R" == Raja S <raja@cs.indiana.edu> writes:

35 messages 2001/01/17
[#9465] Re: reading an entire file as a string — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2001/01/17

raja@cs.indiana.edu (Raja S.) writes:

[#9521] Larry Wall INterview — ianm74@...

Larry was interviewed at the Perl/Ruby conference in Koyoto:

20 messages 2001/01/18
[#10583] Re: Larry Wall INterview — "greg strockbine" <gstrock@...> 2001/02/08

Larry Wall's interview is how I found out

[#9610] Re: 101 Misconceptions About Dynamic Languages — "Ben Tilly" <ben_tilly@...>

"Christian" <christians@syd.microforte.com.au> wrote:

13 messages 2001/01/20

[#9761] Re: 101 Misconceptions About Dynamic Languages — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "C" == Christoph Rippel <crippel@primenet.com> writes:

16 messages 2001/01/23

[#9792] Ruby 162 installer available — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

15 messages 2001/01/24

[#9958] Re: Vim syntax files again. — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Hugh Sasse wrote:

14 messages 2001/01/26
[#10065] Re: Vim syntax files again. — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...> 2001/01/29

On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, Conrad Schneiker wrote:

[#9975] line continuation — "David Ruby" <ruby_david@...>

can a ruby statement break into multiple lines?

18 messages 2001/01/27
[#9976] Re: line continuation — Michael Neumann <neumann@...> 2001/01/27

On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, David Ruby wrote:

[#9988] Re: line continuation — harryo@... (Harry Ohlsen) 2001/01/28

>A statement break into mutliple lines if it is not complete,

[ruby-talk:9883] Re: sockets...again

From: MICHAEL.W.WILSON@...
Date: 2001-01-25 15:16:53 UTC
List: ruby-talk #9883
|--------+----------------------->
|        |          ruby-talk@net|
|        |          lab.co.jp AT |
|        |          smtplink     |
|        |                       |
|        |          01/25/01     |
|        |          09:49 AM     |
|        |                       |
|--------+----------------------->
         >-----------------------------------------------------------|
         |                                                           |
         |       To:     ruby-talk@netlab.co.jp AT smtplink@ccmail   |
         |       cc:     ruby-talk@netlab.co.jp AT smtplink@ccmail,  |
         |       (bcc: MICHAEL W WILSON/NE/USCS)                     |
         |       Subject:     [ruby-talk:9879] Re: sockets...again   |
         >-----------------------------------------------------------|













       >>>>> "M" == MICHAEL W WILSON
       <MICHAEL.W.WILSON@customs.treas.gov> writes:

       M> After my previous message regarding my inability to 'require
        "socket"',
       M> Dave suggested that I add the location of my socket.so
       M> (/usr/gnu/lib/ruby/1.6/sparc-solaris) to my LD_LIBRARY_PATH
       (should I have M> a socket.rb? I don't).  In that same
       directory, I have etc.so, pty.so, M> md5.so, tcltklib.so and a
       bunch of header files.  All of the shared M> libraries have 555
       permissions, all of the headers have 644 permissions. I M>
       added that directory to my LD_LIBRARY_PATH, but still if I do
       something

        #This is strange, I don't need LD_LIBRARY_PATH on 2.7

       #moulon% echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH

       #moulon% ruby -ve 'require "socket" or puts "not found"'
       #ruby 1.6.2 (2000-12-25) [sparc-solaris2.7]
       #moulon%

        #Verify that you have the right $LOAD_PATH

       #moulon% ruby -e 'puts $LOAD_PATH.join("\n")'
       #/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.6/sparc-solaris2.7
       #/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.6
       #/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby
       #/usr/local/lib/ruby/1.6/sparc-solaris2.7
       #/usr/local/lib/ruby/1.6
       #.
       #moulon%

       Sorry if this is hard to read, if you've ever used Lotus Notes,
        you'll know why (it doesn't mark replied to material, I have
       to do it by hand, sorry)

       sol-> ruby -e 'puts $LOAD_PATH.join("\n")'
       /usr/gnu/lib
       /usr/gnu/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.6/sparc-solaris2.6
       /usr/gnu/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.6
       /usr/gnu/lib/ruby/site_ruby
       /usr/gnu/lib/ruby/1.6/sparc-solaris2.6
       /usr/gnu/lib/ruby/1.6
       .
       sol-> file /usr/gnu/lib/ruby/1.6/sparc-solaris2.6/socket.so
       /usr/gnu/lib/ruby/1.6/sparc-solaris2.6/socket.so:       ELF
       32-bit MSB dynamic lib SPARC Version 1, dynamically linked, not
        stripped

       sol-> strings /usr/gnu/lib/ruby/1.6/sparc-solaris2.6/socket.so
       | head -5
       Insecure: can't shutdown socket
       `how' should be either 0, 1, 2
       Insecure: can't close socket
       getsockname(2)
       getpeername(2)

       (I can read it)

       sol-> cd /usr/gnu/lib/ruby/1.6/sparc-solaris2.6/
       sol-> ruby -e 'require "socket" or print "not found\n"'
       not found
       sol->

       I just don't get it....


        #ruby use stat(), verify this :

            #The stat()  function  obtains  information  about  the
            file
            #pointed  to  by  path. Read, write, or execute permission
             of
            #the named file is not required, but all  directories
            listed
            #in the path name leading to the file must be searchable.


       #Guy Decoux



In This Thread

Prev Next