From: jweirich@... Date: 2001-01-15T23:20:41+09:00 Subject: [ruby-talk:9336] Re: 101 Misconceptions About Dynamic Languages >>>>> "Patrick" == Patrick Logan writes: Patrick> In fact, I can cause the entire process to be corrupted Patrick> because of this, and worse. It is a misnomer to say that Patrick> C++ is *strongly* typed. It is not. Hi Patrick, Can you give an example of a language that is both strongly and statically typed given your definitions? -- -- Jim Weirich jweirich@one.net http://w3.one.net/~jweirich --------------------------------------------------------------------- "Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it." -- Donald Knuth (in a memo to Peter van Emde Boas)