From: Patrick Logan <patrickdlogan@...>
Date: 2001-01-22T16:10:05+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:9705] Ruby, FOX, and widely available C++ implementations (Was: Re: 101 Misconceptions About Dynamic Languages)


"Ben Tilly" <ben_tilly@hotmail.com> wrote
in message news:LAW2-F74aJswFCHOzyf00004122@hotmail.com...
>
> I would doubt it.  I have not looked closely, but
> glancing at http://www.unipress.com/toolkit/cfront.html
> it seems to be Unix specific (not even a Linux version!)
> and proprietary.  Even if the output C is portable and
> easy to link to, the development platform is now limited
> to people with CFront.

I wonder if g++ is the most widely available C++.

One reason I ask is that the FOX GUI seems pretty good for
Ruby, but it relies on C++.

--
Patrick Logan
mailto:patrickdlogan@home.com