[#8566] Visions for 2001/1.7.x development? — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi matz and other Ruby developers,

18 messages 2001/01/03
[#8645] Re: Visions for 2001/1.7.x development? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/01/04

Hi,

[#8580] bug?? — jmichel@... (Jean Michel)

I don't understand the following behaviour:

19 messages 2001/01/03

[#8633] Interesting Language performance comparisons - Ruby, OCAML etc — "g forever" <g24ever@...>

13 messages 2001/01/04

[#8774] No :<, :>, etc. methods for Array — "Brian F. Feldman" <green@...>

So, why not include Comparable in Array by default? It shouldn't have any

28 messages 2001/01/07
[#8779] Re: No :<, :>, etc. methods for Array — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/01/07

Hi,

[#8780] Re: No :<, :>, etc. methods for Array — "Brian F. Feldman" <green@...> 2001/01/07

matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) wrote:

[#8781] Re: No :<, :>, etc. methods for Array — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 2001/01/07

In message "[ruby-talk:8780] Re: No :<, :>, etc. methods for Array"

[#8782] Re: No :<, :>, etc. methods for Array — "Brian F. Feldman" <green@...> 2001/01/07

gotoken@math.sci.hokudai.ac.jp (GOTO Kentaro) wrote:

[#8829] Sandbox (again) — wys@... (Clemens Wyss)

Hi,

20 messages 2001/01/08
[#8864] Re: Sandbox (again) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 2001/01/08

On 8 Jan, Clemens Wyss wrote:

[#8931] String confusion — Anders Bengtsson <ndrsbngtssn@...>

Hello everyone,

21 messages 2001/01/09
[#8937] Re: String confusion — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/01/09

Hi,

[#8953] Please remove account from files — "Thomas Daniels" <westernporter@...>

Please take my e-mail address from your files and "CANCEL" my =

14 messages 2001/01/09
[#8983] Re: Please remove account from files — John Rubinubi <rubinubi@...> 2001/01/10

On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Thomas Daniels wrote:

[#9020] time to divide -talk? (was: Please remove account from files) — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2001/01/10

At Wed, 10 Jan 2001 14:23:30 +0900,

[#9047] Re: time to divide -talk? (was: Please remov e account from files) — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

Yasushi Shoji:

27 messages 2001/01/10
[#9049] Re: time to divide -talk? — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2001/01/10

At Thu, 11 Jan 2001 00:20:45 +0900,

[#9153] what about this begin? — Anders Strandl Elkj誡 <ase@...> 2001/01/11

[#9195] Re: Redefining singleton methods — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "H" == Horst Duch=EAne?= <iso-8859-1> writes:

10 messages 2001/01/12

[#9242] polymorphism — Maurice Szmurlo <maurice@...>

hello

73 messages 2001/01/13

[#9279] Can ruby replace php? — Jim Freeze <jim@...>

When I read that ruby could be used to replace PHP I got really

15 messages 2001/01/14

[#9411] The Ruby Way — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

As a member of the "Big 8" newsgroups, "The Ruby Way" (of posting) is to

15 messages 2001/01/17

[#9462] Re: reading an entire file as a string — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "R" == Raja S <raja@cs.indiana.edu> writes:

35 messages 2001/01/17
[#9465] Re: reading an entire file as a string — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2001/01/17

raja@cs.indiana.edu (Raja S.) writes:

[#9521] Larry Wall INterview — ianm74@...

Larry was interviewed at the Perl/Ruby conference in Koyoto:

20 messages 2001/01/18
[#10583] Re: Larry Wall INterview — "greg strockbine" <gstrock@...> 2001/02/08

Larry Wall's interview is how I found out

[#9610] Re: 101 Misconceptions About Dynamic Languages — "Ben Tilly" <ben_tilly@...>

"Christian" <christians@syd.microforte.com.au> wrote:

13 messages 2001/01/20

[#9761] Re: 101 Misconceptions About Dynamic Languages — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "C" == Christoph Rippel <crippel@primenet.com> writes:

16 messages 2001/01/23

[#9792] Ruby 162 installer available — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

15 messages 2001/01/24

[#9958] Re: Vim syntax files again. — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Hugh Sasse wrote:

14 messages 2001/01/26
[#10065] Re: Vim syntax files again. — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...> 2001/01/29

On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, Conrad Schneiker wrote:

[#9975] line continuation — "David Ruby" <ruby_david@...>

can a ruby statement break into multiple lines?

18 messages 2001/01/27
[#9976] Re: line continuation — Michael Neumann <neumann@...> 2001/01/27

On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, David Ruby wrote:

[#9988] Re: line continuation — harryo@... (Harry Ohlsen) 2001/01/28

>A statement break into mutliple lines if it is not complete,

[ruby-talk:10092] Re: Vim syntax files again.

From: Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
Date: 2001-01-29 16:55:45 UTC
List: ruby-talk #10092
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, hipster wrote:

> On Mon, 29 Jan 2001  22:16:32 +0900, Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng wrote:
> > vim 5.7 (gvim in fact) and my vim stuff lives in 
> > C:\Program Files\gvim57\vim\vim57
> 
> I'm terribly sorry. I was assuming a unix environment, too   :\

No problem, I use unix a lot but am trying to get this Win98 machine
setup with a better editor than Wordpad!
> 
> > > if you've put the cfg-files elsewhere, e.g. ~/lib/vim
> > > in ~/.vimrc
> > 
> > I don't seem to have a .vimrc (which is the Unix convention.
> > I do have an _vimrc in directory:
> > C:\Program Files\gvim57\vim
> > though
> 
> is equivalent, however introducing the notion of a home directory on
> windows and putting your customizations there would make sense. Vim
> docs give $HOME/_vimrc or $VIM/_vimrc as the default for ./vimrc

OK, I think in my case it is the latter, see below.
> 
> > > 	let &runtimepath="~/lib/vim," . &runtimepath
> > 
> > What files should reside there?  I have a thing called: vimrun.exe in
> > C:\Program Files\gvim57\vim\vim57
> 
> It has filetypes, menus, syntax files etc. Type ':echo &runtimepath'
> inside vim to see its current value. Vim docs say the PC default is
> "$HOME/vimfiles,$VIM/vimfiles,$VIMRUNTIME".
> 

Here is what it thinks these things are:

:echo $HOME
C:/	# Yes, a forward slash.
:echo $VIM
C:\Program Files\gvim57\vim
:echo &runtimepath
Invalid expression: &runtimepath
:echo $RUNTIMEPATH
	# Nothing at all
:echo $VIMRUNTIME
C:\Program Files\gvim57\vim\vim57	# Wherein lies my syntax dir. etc

> > > in ~/.vim/filetype
> > 
> > I don't seem to have this file "filetype" anywhere, not even in
> > C:\Program Files\gvim57\vim\vim57\syntax
> 
> Correct; the idea is to create it yourself to add new filetypes.
> See ':help new-filetype'
> 
Oh, yes, it talks about creating my_filetypes to extend vim's ideas of
what things are...

> > I can see that stuff when the doc directory is installed at
> > 
> > C:\Program Files\gvim57\vim\vim57\doc
> > 
> > but nothing that looks relevant to my problem.
> > 
> > > If you're using vim 6.0, put the ruby.vim syntax file in the
> > > ~/.vim/syntax directory.
> > It is here at the moment:
> > C:\Program Files\gvim57\vim\vim57\syntax
> > 
> > I tried moving it to:
> > C:\Program Files\gvim57\vim\syntax
> > before, but this didn't help.  Maybe I should move the current ./syntax/*.*
> > to ./*.* to get it to work then?
> 
> There should normally be no need to change the standard layout. I'm

When I moved them I got error messages, so I put them back. :-)

> not familiar with the windows-platform however, maybe someone with
> specific experience could help you here.
> 
> general warning: syntax coloring options and the file layout changed
> quite a bit from 5.x to 6.0. It might be beneficial to skip to 6.0 to
> avoid having to redo everything. I've been using the 6.0 alpha's for
> quite while now and they never crashed on me.

OK, I tend to use stable releases where possible, because I work on the
basis that I am good enough at introducing my own errors, without trying
to guess if they are due to code that is "still wet". :-)
> 
> 	Michel
> 
	Hugh


In This Thread