From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2001-01-20T22:08:15+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:9603] Re: 101 Misconceptions About Dynamic Languages

Hi,

In message "[ruby-talk:9594] Re: 101 Misconceptions About Dynamic Languages"
    on 01/01/20, Josh Stern <jstern@foshay.citilink.com> writes:

|At http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/compar.html, Matz says
|"Ruby's functions (methods) are not first class objects"
|but I don't understand this point, actually.

Well, it was so.  I added method object since then, and forgot to
update the comparison.

							matz.