[#8566] Visions for 2001/1.7.x development? — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi matz and other Ruby developers,

18 messages 2001/01/03
[#8645] Re: Visions for 2001/1.7.x development? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/01/04

Hi,

[#8580] bug?? — jmichel@... (Jean Michel)

I don't understand the following behaviour:

19 messages 2001/01/03

[#8633] Interesting Language performance comparisons - Ruby, OCAML etc — "g forever" <g24ever@...>

13 messages 2001/01/04

[#8774] No :<, :>, etc. methods for Array — "Brian F. Feldman" <green@...>

So, why not include Comparable in Array by default? It shouldn't have any

28 messages 2001/01/07
[#8779] Re: No :<, :>, etc. methods for Array — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/01/07

Hi,

[#8780] Re: No :<, :>, etc. methods for Array — "Brian F. Feldman" <green@...> 2001/01/07

matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) wrote:

[#8781] Re: No :<, :>, etc. methods for Array — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 2001/01/07

In message "[ruby-talk:8780] Re: No :<, :>, etc. methods for Array"

[#8782] Re: No :<, :>, etc. methods for Array — "Brian F. Feldman" <green@...> 2001/01/07

gotoken@math.sci.hokudai.ac.jp (GOTO Kentaro) wrote:

[#8829] Sandbox (again) — wys@... (Clemens Wyss)

Hi,

20 messages 2001/01/08
[#8864] Re: Sandbox (again) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 2001/01/08

On 8 Jan, Clemens Wyss wrote:

[#8931] String confusion — Anders Bengtsson <ndrsbngtssn@...>

Hello everyone,

21 messages 2001/01/09
[#8937] Re: String confusion — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/01/09

Hi,

[#8953] Please remove account from files — "Thomas Daniels" <westernporter@...>

Please take my e-mail address from your files and "CANCEL" my =

14 messages 2001/01/09
[#8983] Re: Please remove account from files — John Rubinubi <rubinubi@...> 2001/01/10

On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Thomas Daniels wrote:

[#9020] time to divide -talk? (was: Please remove account from files) — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2001/01/10

At Wed, 10 Jan 2001 14:23:30 +0900,

[#9047] Re: time to divide -talk? (was: Please remov e account from files) — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

Yasushi Shoji:

27 messages 2001/01/10
[#9049] Re: time to divide -talk? — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2001/01/10

At Thu, 11 Jan 2001 00:20:45 +0900,

[#9153] what about this begin? — Anders Strandl Elkj誡 <ase@...> 2001/01/11

[#9195] Re: Redefining singleton methods — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "H" == Horst Duch=EAne?= <iso-8859-1> writes:

10 messages 2001/01/12

[#9242] polymorphism — Maurice Szmurlo <maurice@...>

hello

73 messages 2001/01/13

[#9279] Can ruby replace php? — Jim Freeze <jim@...>

When I read that ruby could be used to replace PHP I got really

15 messages 2001/01/14

[#9411] The Ruby Way — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

As a member of the "Big 8" newsgroups, "The Ruby Way" (of posting) is to

15 messages 2001/01/17

[#9462] Re: reading an entire file as a string — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "R" == Raja S <raja@cs.indiana.edu> writes:

35 messages 2001/01/17
[#9465] Re: reading an entire file as a string — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2001/01/17

raja@cs.indiana.edu (Raja S.) writes:

[#9521] Larry Wall INterview — ianm74@...

Larry was interviewed at the Perl/Ruby conference in Koyoto:

20 messages 2001/01/18
[#10583] Re: Larry Wall INterview — "greg strockbine" <gstrock@...> 2001/02/08

Larry Wall's interview is how I found out

[#9610] Re: 101 Misconceptions About Dynamic Languages — "Ben Tilly" <ben_tilly@...>

"Christian" <christians@syd.microforte.com.au> wrote:

13 messages 2001/01/20

[#9761] Re: 101 Misconceptions About Dynamic Languages — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "C" == Christoph Rippel <crippel@primenet.com> writes:

16 messages 2001/01/23

[#9792] Ruby 162 installer available — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

15 messages 2001/01/24

[#9958] Re: Vim syntax files again. — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Hugh Sasse wrote:

14 messages 2001/01/26
[#10065] Re: Vim syntax files again. — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...> 2001/01/29

On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, Conrad Schneiker wrote:

[#9975] line continuation — "David Ruby" <ruby_david@...>

can a ruby statement break into multiple lines?

18 messages 2001/01/27
[#9976] Re: line continuation — Michael Neumann <neumann@...> 2001/01/27

On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, David Ruby wrote:

[#9988] Re: line continuation — harryo@... (Harry Ohlsen) 2001/01/28

>A statement break into mutliple lines if it is not complete,

[ruby-talk:9065] Re: time to divide -talk? (was: Please remove account from files)

From: Patrik Sundberg <ps@...>
Date: 2001-01-10 18:29:17 UTC
List: ruby-talk #9065
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 01:35:17AM +0900, David Alan Black wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Yasushi Shoji wrote:
> 
> > At Wed, 10 Jan 2001 14:23:30 +0900,
> > John Rubinubi wrote:
> > 
> > > Ruby *is* right for what I do (play with & learn Ruby) but I have to agree
> > > with Stan that the volume of mail on this list is unmanagable. I wish
> > > there was a lower volume mailing list aimed at beginners, (or at least
> > > those not on the cutting edge) and not echoed to usenet.
> > 
> > well, i kinda agree.  these days (after Dr. Dobb's article?) -talk has
> > about 100/day posts, which is much larger number compare to all three
> > japanese lists combined.
> 
> I'm thrilled -- what's everyone's problem?  :-)
> 
> > I don't like the idea of beginners list (who's gonna answer questions
> > if all of them are beginners ;), but having developper's list (for
> > people who want to discuss about interpreter, some new features or
> > some topic beginners don't wanna care) wouldn't kill -talk, would it?
> 
> Just to voice a bit of skepticism....  Has this kind of list-splitting
> ever worked?  I'm thinking of Linux and Perl, mainly, and I'm thinking
> of Usenet, mainly, so maybe there are exceptions.  (I've never been
> on the Perl5 Porters list, so maybe that's one.)  But it always seems
> that the splitting just results in a lot of cross-posting, and then
> arguments about whether the cross-posting was appropriate, and so on.
> 
> Once again, I wish I had access to the Japanese Ruby lists, which
> sound like they're pretty successful from this perspective.  

Why not make english the language of existing ruby-*
lists and use those instead of creating new ones? I don't see a reason for
having both english and japanese lists covering the same material. That way
people just misses interesting discussions. English people can't get the
japanese discussions and the japanese people have to read both lists to not
miss out.

I am not that well informed with japanese society, but I imagine that most
computer-literate people, especially programmers, understands english just
fine and from the postings japanese people make here in ruby-talk I can't
complain about the level of expression either (being from Sweden,
Englishmen might have another opinion of both japanese people's and my
english :) ). Is english that big of a problem for the japanese?

I for one would like to read the ruby-ext list..

-- 
Patrik Sundberg  -  email: ps@raditex.se || ps@radiac.mine.nu
---> telefon: 013-178 567  -  mobiltelefon: 070-760 22 40 <---

In This Thread