From: Avi Bryant <avi@...4.com>
Date: 2001-01-27T04:42:36+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:9950] Re: ANN: AspectR 0.2


On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Robert Feldt wrote:

> > The thought that came out of all of this, though, was: perhaps we want to
> > resolve our namespace issues by taking a metaobject* approach instead, and
> > having the pre/post calls be to instances of an Aspect subclass (since we
> > need a method hash now anyway - my original hack was trying to avoid
> > that), rather than to methods in an included module.  It enforces a little
> > more encapsulation, which may or may not be a bad thing... should aspects
> > have access to the private members of the object they're wrapping?
> >
> It might be a good idea

Ok, well, if anyone's interested -
there's a cleaned up and metaobject-ized version of AspectR (well, minus a
lot of Robert's additions, which I hope he will promptly merge back, or I 
will if he doesn't) at

http://beta4.com/mop.rb

Just out of curiosity - *is* anyone interested?  Or should we move this
off list?

avi