From: Stephen White <steve@...>
Date: 2001-01-06T08:05:20+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:8710] Re: Interesting Language performance comparisons - Ruby, OCAML etc

On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Josh Stern wrote:

> One strategy that I suspect would help Ruby GC would be to treat class
> definitions, method definitions, and global objects differently than other
> garbage, since they are expected to be long-lived.  Perhaps they should go
> on a different, compactified heap.

Oooh, a bloom filter. :)

-- 
  steve@deaf.org