[#18974] Perl/Python/Ruby common backend (Perl6) — ptkwt@...1.aracnet.com (Phil Tomson)

There is a thread about using .NET's CLR as a backend for Ruby, but how

17 messages 2001/08/01

[#19064] ANN: Code Amelioration Contest (presented by Ruby Conference 2001) — David Alan Black <dblack@...>

17 messages 2001/08/03
[#19184] Re: ANN: Code Amelioration Contest (presented by Ruby Conference 2001) — John Carter <john.carter@...> 2001/08/06

On Fri, 3 Aug 2001, David Alan Black wrote:

[#19185] Re: ANN: Code Amelioration Contest (presented by Ruby Conference 2001) — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2001/08/06

Hello --

[#19186] Re: ANN: Code Amelioration Contest (presented by Ruby Conference 2001) — John Carter <john.carter@...> 2001/08/06

On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, David Alan Black wrote:

[#19125] My 1st look @ ruby: No prototypes and problem with String#gsub — stesch@... (Stefan Scholl)

My first ruby program:

23 messages 2001/08/04

[#19192] Some remarks from a nembie in Ruby — Renaud HEBERT <renaud.hebert@...>

After having read the book "Programming Ruby: The Pragmatic Programmer's

38 messages 2001/08/06

[#19269] Re: Perl/Python/Ruby common backend (Parrot, can Ruby play too?) — ptkwt@...1.aracnet.com (Phil Tomson)

In article <72X97.12093$9i1.972452@e420r-atl1.usenetserver.com>,

50 messages 2001/08/07
[#19349] Re: Perl/Python/Ruby common backend (Parrot, can Ruby play too?) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/08/08

[#19456] Re: Perl/Python/Ruby common backend (Parrot, can Ruby play too?) — Harry Ohlsen <harryo@...> 2001/08/09

Ned Konz wrote:

[#19451] Re: Help! I'm still confused about threadin g in the ML — "Morris, Chris" <chris.morris@...>

> Is there an Outlook option to turn on In-Reply-To or References

14 messages 2001/08/09
[#19453] Re: Help! I'm still confused about threadin g in the ML — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2001/08/09

"Morris, Chris" <chris.morris@snelling.com> writes:

[#19506] the way class variables work — David Alan Black <dblack@...>

Hello --

51 messages 2001/08/10
[#19511] Re: the way class variables work — Chris Uzdavinis <chris@...> 2001/08/11

David Alan Black <dblack@candle.superlink.net> writes:

[#19524] order and freedom in Ruby (was: Re: Re: the way class variables work) — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2001/08/11

Hello --

[#19517] Why not?: Assigning to self — furufuru@... (Ryo Furue)

Hi there,

55 messages 2001/08/11
[#19689] Re: Why not?: Assigning to self — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...> 2001/08/14

On 13 Aug 2001 20:59:54 -0700, furufuru@ccsr.u-tokyo.ac.jp (Ryo Furue)

[#19694] Re: Why not?: Assigning to self — Ned Konz <ned@...> 2001/08/14

On Tuesday 14 August 2001 05:09 am, Ron Jeffries wrote:

[#19695] Re: Why not?: Assigning to self — ts <decoux@...> 2001/08/14

>>>>> "N" == Ned Konz <ned@bike-nomad.com> writes:

[#19696] Re: Why not?: Assigning to self — Ned Konz <ned@...> 2001/08/14

On Tuesday 14 August 2001 07:51 am, you wrote:

[#19697] Re: Why not?: Assigning to self — ts <decoux@...> 2001/08/14

>>>>> "N" == Ned Konz <ned@bike-nomad.com> writes:

[#19700] Re: Why not?: Assigning to self — Ned Konz <ned@...> 2001/08/14

On Tuesday 14 August 2001 08:27 am, you wrote:

[#19701] Re: Why not?: Assigning to self — ts <decoux@...> 2001/08/14

>>>>> "N" == Ned Konz <ned@bike-nomad.com> writes:

[#19703] Re: Why not?: Assigning to self — Ned Konz <ned@...> 2001/08/14

On Tuesday 14 August 2001 09:05 am, Guy Decoux wrote:

[#19704] Re: Why not?: Assigning to self — ts <decoux@...> 2001/08/14

>>>>> "N" == Ned Konz <ned@bike-nomad.com> writes:

[#19708] Re: Why not?: Assigning to self — Ned Konz <ned@...> 2001/08/14

On Tuesday 14 August 2001 09:27 am, you wrote:

[#19709] Re: Why not?: Assigning to self — ts <decoux@...> 2001/08/14

>>>>> "N" == Ned Konz <ned@bike-nomad.com> writes:

[#19713] Re: Why not?: Assigning to self — Ned Konz <ned@...> 2001/08/14

On Tuesday 14 August 2001 09:45 am, you wrote:

[#19750] Re: Why not?: Assigning to self — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/08/15

Hi,

[#19819] Re: Why not?: Assigning to self — Ned Konz <ned@...> 2001/08/15

On Tuesday 14 August 2001 08:14 pm, matz wrote:

[#19852] Re: Why not?: Assigning to self — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/08/16

Hi,

[#19857] Re: Why not?: Assigning to self — "Florian G. Pflug" <fgp@...> 2001/08/16

On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 11:05:59AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#19858] Re: Why not?: Assigning to self — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/08/16

Hi,

[#19867] Re: Why not?: Assigning to self — "Pit Capitain" <pit@...> 2001/08/16

Just a followup at (my) current end of the thread:

[#19550] Forced garbage collection — Lars Christensen <larsch@...>

14 messages 2001/08/11
[#19562] Re: Forced garbage collection — "Nat Pryce" <nat.pryce@...13media.com> 2001/08/12

From: "Lars Christensen" <larsch@cs.auc.dk>

[#19551] /.ed again — Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@...>

Ruy gets slasdotted again ;)

19 messages 2001/08/11

[#19650] Ruby Newbie mailing list — Michael Pence <mikepence@...>

Hello all.

14 messages 2001/08/13
[#19656] RE: Ruby Newbie mailing list — "Louis Brothers" <lcb134@...> 2001/08/13

We had a similar discussion on the OmniWeb Objective-C mailing list not to

[#19659] Re: Ruby Newbie mailing list — Michael Pence <mikepence@...> 2001/08/13

I appreciate your references to Objectionable-C ;-)

[#19685] Compiling Ruby with cygwin and Tk support — Manuel Zabelt <ng@...>

Hello!

13 messages 2001/08/14

[#19718] General (GUI/license) questions — Ryan Tarpine <rtarpine@...>

First: Kero commented in the description of his new Ruby Agenda program

18 messages 2001/08/14

[#19755] "new" returning nil: how to report the failure of object creation — furufuru@... (Ryo Furue)

Hi there,

14 messages 2001/08/15

[#19758] The GUI poll is in, and the results are surprising — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

40 messages 2001/08/15
[#19774] Re: The GUI poll is in, and the results are surprising — Lars Christensen <larsch@...> 2001/08/15

On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#19784] Re: The GUI poll is in, and the results aresurprising — "Lyle Johnson" <ljohnson@...> 2001/08/15

> Please don't forget what Ruby is all about in this discussion! I think

[#19824] Ruby GUI — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

The concept of a new GUI is somewhat appealing,

16 messages 2001/08/15

[#20033] Ruby Article — Joshua Drake <jd.nospam@...>

Hello,

38 messages 2001/08/20

[#20127] Another Possible RCR - Wrappers via Mixins — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

The main difference between mix-ins and multiple inheritence is (to my understanding) that parent classes do not call child code, but mix-ins do.

15 messages 2001/08/22

[#20135] Bruce Eckel's criticism of Ruby — Ned Konz <ned@...>

Python.org links to http://www.mindview.net/Etc/notes.html#Ruby , saying

24 messages 2001/08/22

[#20183] ++ Operator — kamphausen@... (SKa)

Dear Community,

35 messages 2001/08/23
[#20234] Re: ++ Operator — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2001/08/24

matz@ruby-lang.org (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:

[#20236] Re: ++ Operator — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/08/24

Hi,

[#20209] In Ruby 0 is true but nil is false.. or how to shoot yourself?.. — Guillaume Cottenceau <gc@...>

I have a simple Audio-CD database (using CSV format). I was writing a

11 messages 2001/08/23

[#20254] File.readline(s) — Michael Husmann <michael.husmann@...>

I am reading a 55MB ASCII file by using File.readline(s) which takes on

14 messages 2001/08/24

[#20303] New Windows InstallShield version of Ruby — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

19 messages 2001/08/24

[#20307] Backwards language — "Sean Middleditch" <elanthis@...>

Greetings,

30 messages 2001/08/24

[ruby-talk:20212] Lazy computation (was: breaking out of nested loops)

From: Brian Marick <marick@...>
Date: 2001-08-23 22:03:02 UTC
List: ruby-talk #20212
At 03:18 AM 8/23/01, you wrote:
>I'd still like to find a way to suspend an arbitrary computation, get a 
>"resumer" that can be passed around and called anywhere to return the next 
>value.

Here's one. This one has ruby-unit tests, so is more likely to work. It's 
pretty terse (except for the documentation) and seems clean. But consider 
this a submission to the Code Amelioration contest.
If anyone wants the tests, ask.

% cat lazy.rb
=begin

A LazyComputation is an object that wraps the state of an ongoing
computation. Each time the computation calls
LazyComputation#value=, it is suspended. That value is delivered
to a caller who requests it with LazyComputation#value, which
should only be called if LazyComputation#has_value is true.

Here is a simple example: a stream that generates all the
integers. (See example_integers below.)

   # Wrap an infinite loop:
   lazy = LazyComputation.new { | lazy |
     i = 0
     loop {
       lazy.value = i
       i += 1
     }
   }

   # Print the first few integers.
   for i in 0..10
     puts lazy.value
   end

That example didn't show the use of LazyComputation#has_value, so
here's one that does. It also shows that 'value' has a synonym,
push.  With it, recursive methods that use an array accumulator can be
made lazy without changing the code. (See example_tree below.)

This example flattens the list below into [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8].

   tree = [ [1, 2], [3, [4, [5, 6], 7], 8]]

   def atoms(tree, accumulator=[])
     if tree.is_a?(Array)
       tree.each { | e | atoms(e, accumulator) }
     else
       accumulator.push(tree)
     end
     accumulator
   end

   puts "Here is the eager version."
   puts atoms(tree).inspect

   # Now do it lazily
   lazy = LazyComputation.new { | lazy |
     atoms(tree, lazy)
   }

   result = []
   while lazy.has_value
     result.push(lazy.value)
   end
   puts "Here is the lazy version."
   puts result.inspect

Problems to Brian Marick (marick@visibleworkings.com)
Thanks to Pit Capitain for cleaner continuation-calling code.

=end

class LazyComputation

   # How does this work? @compute_next_value is the continuation of the
   # wrapped computation. @return_from_API is the continuation of the
   # initializer or of a call to value(). A call to value() sets
   # @return_from_API and jumps to the wrapped computation. That
   # normally finds the next value, saves the continuation state, and
   # jumps back to @return_from_API. If the computation runs out of
   # values, it falls out of its block, which returns to initialize(),
   # which jumps to the continuation of the most recent API call
   # (@return_from_API), which is most likely a call to value().

   attr_reader :has_value

   def initialize()
     @has_value = callcc { | @return_from_API |
       yield self
       @return_from_API.call(false)
     }
   end

   def value
     raise IndexError.new("There is no next value.") unless @has_value

     retval = @next
     @has_value = callcc { | @return_from_API |
       @compute_next_value.call
       raise RuntimeError, "Statement should never be reached."
     }
     return retval
   end

   def value=(retval)
     @next = retval
     callcc do | @compute_next_value |
       @return_from_API.call(true)
       raise RuntimeError, "Statement should never be reached."
     end
   end

   # Allows a function that normally would push onto an array
   # to be automagically turned lazy. See example_tree below.
   alias_method :push, :value=

end


## EXAMPLES

class LazyExamples

   def example_integers
     puts '== Lazily create all the integers.'
     lazy = LazyComputation.new { | lazy |
       i = 0
       loop {
         lazy.value = i
         i += 1
       }
     }
     for i in 0..10
       puts lazy.value
     end
   end

   # Plain-vanilla function that flattens a tree
   # into a list (array). Thank you, John McCarthy.
   def atoms(tree, accumulator=[])
     if tree.is_a?(Array)
       tree.each { | e | atoms(e, accumulator) }
     else
       accumulator.push(tree)
     end
     accumulator
   end

   def example_tree
     puts '== Lazily descend a tree.'
     tree = [ [1, 2], [3, [4, [5, 6], 7], 8]]

     puts "Here is the eager version."
     puts atoms(tree).inspect

     # Now do it lazily
     lazy = LazyComputation.new { | lazy |
       atoms(tree, lazy)
     }

     result = []
     while lazy.has_value
       result.push(lazy.value)
     end
     puts "Here is the lazy version."
     puts result.inspect
   end

end

if __FILE__ == $0
   LazyExamples.new.example_integers
   LazyExamples.new.example_tree
end


--
Brian Marick, marick@testing.com
www.testing.com - Software testing services and resources
www.testingcraft.com - Where software testers exchange techniques
www.visibleworkings.com - Adequate understanding of system internals

In This Thread