From: Todd Gillespie <toddg@...128.ma.utexas.edu>
Date: 2001-08-28T12:57:33+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:20461] Re: Backwards language

Avi Bryant <avi@beta4.com> wrote:
: Additions, anyone?  Haskell, maybe, but I haven't used it enough to
: provide a useful rationale.

Befunge, for multi-dimensional code flow.
Unlamda, to instill fear.
LabView, to see that one day you will be automated.

But seriously, one should learn an ML to see what a real type system looks
like.
Haskell for a pure functional, and some of the monad development, which is
very recent, very current, and could be a very fruitful methodology.

:> Logo?

: Better yet, StarLogo.

*snicker*