From: Christophe Broult Date: 2001-08-10T04:47:13+09:00 Subject: [ruby-talk:19448] Re: Help! I'm still confused about threadin g in the ML This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C1210C.0456DC10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > -----Original Message----- > From: Ned Konz [mailto:ned@bike-nomad.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 3:40 PM > To: ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org > Subject: [ruby-talk:19447] Re: Help! I'm still confused about > threading > in the ML > > > On Thursday 09 August 2001 12:23 pm, you wrote: > > I'm trying to track down these various message threading > problems, and > > I'm coming to the conclusion that it isn't the gateway's > > fault. However, I'd appreciate any assistance in understanding this. > > > > Take messages 19444 and 19445. 19444 was posted to > comp.lang.ruby and > > gatewayed through to the mailing list. The Message-ID in > the header is > > the same on both the newsgroup and in the mailing list message. > > > > The response 19445 was sent in via the mailing list. It has no > > 'references' or 'in-reply-to' header. In fact it has no > reference that > > I can see to the original article. > > > > Is this an MUA problem, or is the gateway stripping out some other > > field that the MUA needs to do the linking? > > It sounds like a user agent or user problem. For all you > know, Christophe > just typed in "RE: question about ::" into his Subject line. > Or maybe he's > using a mail agent that doesn't set the in-reply-to or > references headers for > some reason. I have to use Outlook (I would rather use GNUS but I still have to figure out how to handle Outlook appointments). This is a reply to message 19447. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C1210C.0456DC10 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" RE: [ruby-talk:19447] Re: Help! I'm still confused about threading in the ML

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ned Konz [mailto:ned@bike-nomad.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 3:40 PM
> To: ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org
> Subject: [ruby-talk:19447] Re: Help! I'm still confused about
> threading
> in the ML
>
>
> On Thursday 09 August 2001 12:23 pm, you wrote:
> > I'm trying to track down these various message threading
> problems, and
> > I'm coming to the conclusion that it isn't the gateway's
> > fault. However, I'd appreciate any assistance in understanding this.
> >
> > Take messages 19444 and 19445. 19444 was posted to
> comp.lang.ruby and
> > gatewayed through to the mailing list. The Message-ID in
> the header is
> > the same on both the newsgroup and in the mailing list message.
> >
> > The response 19445 was sent in via the mailing list. It has no
> > 'references' or 'in-reply-to' header. In fact it has no
> reference that
> > I can see to the original article.
> >
> > Is this an MUA problem, or is the gateway stripping out some other
> > field that the MUA needs to do the linking?
>
> It sounds like a user agent or user problem. For all you
> know, Christophe
> just typed in "RE: question about ::" into his Subject line.
> Or maybe he's
> using a mail agent that doesn't set the in-reply-to or
> references headers for
> some reason.

I have to use Outlook (I would rather use GNUS but I still have to figure out how to handle Outlook appointments).
 
This is a reply to message 19447.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C1210C.0456DC10--