From: Dave Thomas Date: 2001-08-07T01:17:18+09:00 Subject: [ruby-talk:19228] Re: Some remarks from a nembie in Ruby Renaud HEBERT writes: > While the point 10 may not be important enough to warrant such a change, > I still do think that the point 20) is important: maybe adding > additional methods getps and getpline (with p for portability) which > gives only the line and not the end-of-line would be enough if the > documentation explains the portability risk of gets and getline.. I'd much, much rather see a IO#autochomp= method. To be honest, I'm surprised at how rarely I end up using chomp. I used to use it all the time in Perl. I'm not sure why Ruby is different. Dave