From: Ryan Tarpine <rtarpine@...>
Date: 2001-08-15T11:10:56+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:19748] Re: General (GUI/license) questions

MikkelFJ wrote:
> 
> If I recall correctly, the Q license of Trolltech and a license used by
> AT&T labs (or Bell labs or Lucent labs or whatever it's called now) do
> allow manipulation and do require changes to be published.
> 
> Mikkel

I didn't mean that they had to publish changes, only contact me directly, 
if possible.  Of all the licences I've reviewed, though, I do particularly 
feel the Ruby licence gives the most freedom while still placing some 
control.  Should it be altered for distribution of source-only programs?  
Section 3 doesn't seem to apply.  Also, should I take out sections 4 and 5? 
 Or would that not allow me to still call the licence the Rubby licence?  
Thanks

-- 
Ryan Tarpine, rtarpine@hotmail.com
"Technology is a queer thing.  It brings you great gifts in one hand, and 
it stabs you in the back with the other."
         -- C.P. Snow