From: Todd Gillespie <toddg@...128.ma.utexas.edu>
Date: 2001-08-04T07:07:29+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:19090] Re: Code Amelioration Contest (presented by Ruby Conference 2001)

Eli Green <eli.green@codedogs.ca> wrote:
: from MikkelFJ on 2001-08-04 at 05:27:15:
:> Instead of the approach below, I could also have created location objects,
:> item objects etc. But in this case everything is handled using strings in a
:> much cleaner way than an OO approach would have given. The approach is also
:> extensible in that You can easily add new properties to a location or an
:> item without having to update a number of objects.
:> 
:> Mikkel
:> 

: <snip>

: I fail to see how this is not OO. It's a design decision of where to separate
: the objects ... you're still using objects. =)


<Yoda>
And that is why you fail.
</Yoda>