[#20675] RCR: non-bang equivalent to []= — Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@...>

Hi,

49 messages 2001/09/01
[#20774] Re: RCR: non-bang equivalent to []= — Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@...> 2001/09/03

I wrote:

[#20778] Re: RCR: non-bang equivalent to []= — Kevin Smith <kevinbsmith@...> 2001/09/03

--- Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com> wrote:

[#20715] oreilly buch von matz - website online — markus jais <info@...>

hi

43 messages 2001/09/02
[#20717] Re: OReilly Ruby book has snail on cover — ptkwt@...1.aracnet.com (Phil Tomson) 2001/09/02

Actually, thanks for posting it here. I was trying to search OReilly's

[#20922] Re: OReilly Ruby book has snail on cover — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2001/09/05

On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Phil Tomson wrote:

[#20768] Minor cgi.rb question — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

I don't have much experience with

25 messages 2001/09/03

[#20770] Calling member methods from C++ — jglueck@... (Bernhard Glk)

Some quetsions have been solved for me, but my message system does not

12 messages 2001/09/03

[#20976] destructor — Frank Sonnemans <ruby@...>

Does Ruby have a destructor as in C++?

25 messages 2001/09/07

[#21218] Ruby objects <-> XML: anyone working on this? — senderista@... (Tobin Baker)

Are there any Ruby analogs of these two Python modules (xml_pickle,

13 messages 2001/09/15

[#21296] nested require files need path internally — Bob Gustafson <bobgus@...>

Version: 1.64

29 messages 2001/09/18
[#21298] Re: nested require files need path internally — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2001/09/18

Hello --

[#21302] Re: nested require files need path internally — Bob Gustafson <bobgus@...> 2001/09/18

On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, David Alan Black wrote:

[#21303] Re: nested require files need path internally — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/09/18

Hi,

[#21306] Re: nested require files need path internally — Lars Christensen <larsch@...> 2001/09/18

On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#21307] Re: nested require files need path internally — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/09/18

Hi,

[#21331] Re: nested require files need path internally — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2001/09/18

> The big difference is C++ search done in compile time, Ruby search

[#21340] Re: nested require files need path internally — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/09/18

Hi,

[#21353] Re: nested require files need path internally — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2001/09/18

On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#21366] Re: nested require files need path internally — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/09/19

Hi,

[#21368] Re: nested require files need path internally — "Julian Fitzell" <julian-ml@...4.com> 2001/09/19

On 19/09/2001 at 10:12 AM matz@ruby-lang.org wrote:

[#21376] Re: nested require files need path internally — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/09/19

Hi,

[#21406] Re: nested require files need path internally — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2001/09/19

On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#21315] Suggestions for new CGI lib — anders@... (Anders Johannsen)

From the comp.lang.ruby thread "Minor cgi.rb question" (2001-09-03), I

21 messages 2001/09/18

[#21413] Ruby/objects book in style of The Little Lisper — Brian Marick <marick@...>

I fell in love with Lisp in the early 80's. Back then, I read a book called

36 messages 2001/09/19
[#21420] Re: Ruby/objects book in style of The Little Lisper — Christopher Sawtell <csawtell@...> 2001/09/20

On 20 Sep 2001 06:19:44 +0900, Brian Marick wrote:

[#21479] Re: Ruby/objects book in style of The Little Lisper — Kevin Smith <kevinbsmith@...> 2001/09/21

--- Christopher Sawtell <csawtell@paradise.net.nz> wrote:

[#21491] SV: Re: Ruby/objects book in style of The Little Lisper — "Mikkel Damsgaard" <mikkel_damsgaard@...> 2001/09/21

[#21494] Re: SV: Re: Ruby/objects book in style of The Little Lisper — Kevin Smith <kevinbsmith@...> 2001/09/21

--- Mikkel Damsgaard <mikkel_damsgaard@mailme.dk> wrote:

[#21510] Re: SV: Re: Ruby/objects book in style of The Little Lisper — Todd Gillespie <toddg@...> 2001/09/22

On Sat, 22 Sep 2001, Kevin Smith wrote:

[#21514] Re: SV: Re: Ruby/objects book in style of The Little Lisper — Kevin Smith <kevinbsmith@...> 2001/09/22

--- Todd Gillespie <toddg@mail.ma.utexas.edu> wrote:

[#21535] irb — Fabio <fabio.spelta@...>

Hello. :) I'm new here, and I have not found an archive of the previous

15 messages 2001/09/22

[#21616] opening a named pipe? — "Avdi B. Grimm" <avdi@...>

I'm having trouble reading from a named pipe in linux. basicly, I'm

12 messages 2001/09/24

[#21685] manipulating "immutable" objects such as Fixnum from within callbacks & al... — Guillaume Cottenceau <gc@...>

Hello,

15 messages 2001/09/25

[#21798] Ruby internal (guide to the source) — "Benoit Cerrina" <benoit.cerrina@...>

Hi,

22 messages 2001/09/28

[ruby-talk:21476] Re: How to tell if port is in use...

From: William Sobel <wsobel@...>
Date: 2001-09-21 01:48:42 UTC
List: ruby-talk #21476
The problem you are experiencing seems to be intentional. The socket
is set to enable reuse of the address. I think that UNIX ignores this
for all but UDP multicast sockets, Windows appears to honor the
request, for what reason I can not guess. (Is this a Windows bug or a
Ruby bug?) Any idea why this option was set?

Hope this helps,
-- Will

<CODE filename="t.rb">
require 'socket'

p TCPServer.new("localhost", 3333)
p TCPServer.new("localhost", 3333)
</CODE>

[E:/ruby/test] ruby -v
ruby 1.7.1 (2001-09-08) [i586-mswin32]

Before:
[E:/ruby/test] ruby t.rb
#<TCPServer:0x2b89980>
#<TCPServer:0x2b89920>

After:
[E:/ruby/test] ruby t.rb
#<TCPServer:0x2b89980>
t.rb:5:in `new': Unknown Error - "bind(2)" (Errno::E10048)
        from t.rb:5

Index: socket.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /src/ruby/ext/socket/socket.c,v
retrieving revision 1.54
diff -w -c -r1.54 socket.c
*** socket.c	2001/09/05 22:18:56	1.54
--- socket.c	2001/09/21 00:39:51
***************
*** 851,858 ****
  	}
  	if (type == INET_SERVER) {
!  	    status = 1;
! 	    setsockopt(fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR,
! 		       (char*)&status, sizeof(status));
  	    status = bind(fd, res->ai_addr, res->ai_addrlen);
  	    syscall = "bind(2)";
  	}
--- 851,858 ----
  	}
  	if (type == INET_SERVER) {
! //  	    status = 1;
! //	    setsockopt(fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR,
! //		       (char*)&status, sizeof(status));
  	    status = bind(fd, res->ai_addr, res->ai_addrlen);
  	    syscall = "bind(2)";
  	}

Jonathan Entner <jonathan.entner@jhuapl.edu> writes:

> "Hal E. Fulton" wrote:
> > > pigeon% ruby -rsocket -e 'p TCPServer.new("localhost",
> > 3333);TCPServer.new("localhost", 3333)'
> > > #<TCPServer:0x401b3f50>
> > > -e:1:in `new': Address already in use - "bind(2)" (Errno::EADDRINUSE)
> > >         from -e:1
> > > pigeon%
> > 
> > Maybe it's a Windows issue. Not sure how the networking stuff
> > differs... I think NT is more Unix-like, but I'm using 98 (and
> > 1.6.3 cygwin).
> > 
> > In that environment, this one-liner does not give me an error.
> 

<... snip>

> 
> Jonathan Entner
> jonathan.entner@jhuapl.edu

In This Thread