From: chad fowler <chadfowler@...>
Date: 2001-09-11T08:48:23+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:21050] Re: Mascots_-_Just_say_NO_to_voting!_:-)

> Hi,
> 
> "David Alan Black" wrote something like this:
> (I added the generic <<...>> stuff.)
> 
> > On <<many previous occasions>>, <<way too many
> people>> wrote:
> >
> > > I'd like to see <<this or that or nothing>> as
> > > the <<official or unofficial>> Ruby mascot.
> >
> > I guess I'd lulled myself into thinking this
> possibility had gone
> away.
> > See [ruby-talk:14209], which is part of an
> enormous thread on this.
> 
> Me too. What on earth prompted reviving the mascot
> issue!?
> 
> > (If we get back into this logo/mascot thing, could
> we do as much of it
> > as possible with references to old posts, since
> everything has already
> > been said? :-)
> 
> OK!
> 
> And could we always be sure to _always_ include this
> reference:
> [ruby-talk:
> 20990], which is the (preceding) post that made that
> request and which
> pretty much sums up why most people would prefer not
> to see this very
> contentious and divisive issue reopened.
> 
> And thanks to the many people that _didn't_ respond
> with their favorite
> and different alternatives (again).
> 

Knowing full well that I'm just adding to the problem,
I can't resist throwing in an annoying "me too!". 
Sorry, it couldn't be helped.  If the language were a
gimmick, I might be a little more worried about coming
up with a mascot.  

Chad

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
http://im.yahoo.com