From: accbuy@... (Scott)
Date: 2001-09-24T01:58:06+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:21603] Re: Ruby licence in commercial software

matz@ruby-lang.org (Yukihiro Matsumoto) wrote in message news:<1001250135.024047.13293.nullmailer@ev.netlab.jp>...
> Hi,
> 
> In message "[ruby-talk:21583] Ruby licence in commercial software"
>     on 01/09/23, Scott <accbuy@hotmail.com> writes:
> 
> |Can anyone tell my in a clear, concise way what I need to look at to
> |determine if the Ruby license will allow me to create a commercial
> |piece of software that is cross platform and distribute it?
> 
> For convenience, consider it as LGPL.  You must disclose Ruby's
> source, not yours.
> 
> 							matz.

Thank you for the reply.

Having not worked with the LGPL as much as probably others on this
list; is there check list or site that shows what things they would
have to do when releasing the commercial software as far as notices
and readme's?

The reason behind this question is:  What if you feel it makes no
difference to the user what the program was written in?  You could
include all the source but never really say correct?   OR is there
something that has to be shown to the user ?  What have other
companies done ?