[#20675] RCR: non-bang equivalent to []= — Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@...>

Hi,

49 messages 2001/09/01
[#20774] Re: RCR: non-bang equivalent to []= — Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@...> 2001/09/03

I wrote:

[#20778] Re: RCR: non-bang equivalent to []= — Kevin Smith <kevinbsmith@...> 2001/09/03

--- Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com> wrote:

[#20715] oreilly buch von matz - website online — markus jais <info@...>

hi

43 messages 2001/09/02
[#20717] Re: OReilly Ruby book has snail on cover — ptkwt@...1.aracnet.com (Phil Tomson) 2001/09/02

Actually, thanks for posting it here. I was trying to search OReilly's

[#20922] Re: OReilly Ruby book has snail on cover — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2001/09/05

On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Phil Tomson wrote:

[#20768] Minor cgi.rb question — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

I don't have much experience with

25 messages 2001/09/03

[#20770] Calling member methods from C++ — jglueck@... (Bernhard Glk)

Some quetsions have been solved for me, but my message system does not

12 messages 2001/09/03

[#20976] destructor — Frank Sonnemans <ruby@...>

Does Ruby have a destructor as in C++?

25 messages 2001/09/07

[#21218] Ruby objects <-> XML: anyone working on this? — senderista@... (Tobin Baker)

Are there any Ruby analogs of these two Python modules (xml_pickle,

13 messages 2001/09/15

[#21296] nested require files need path internally — Bob Gustafson <bobgus@...>

Version: 1.64

29 messages 2001/09/18
[#21298] Re: nested require files need path internally — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2001/09/18

Hello --

[#21302] Re: nested require files need path internally — Bob Gustafson <bobgus@...> 2001/09/18

On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, David Alan Black wrote:

[#21303] Re: nested require files need path internally — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/09/18

Hi,

[#21306] Re: nested require files need path internally — Lars Christensen <larsch@...> 2001/09/18

On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#21307] Re: nested require files need path internally — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/09/18

Hi,

[#21331] Re: nested require files need path internally — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2001/09/18

> The big difference is C++ search done in compile time, Ruby search

[#21340] Re: nested require files need path internally — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/09/18

Hi,

[#21353] Re: nested require files need path internally — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2001/09/18

On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#21366] Re: nested require files need path internally — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/09/19

Hi,

[#21368] Re: nested require files need path internally — "Julian Fitzell" <julian-ml@...4.com> 2001/09/19

On 19/09/2001 at 10:12 AM matz@ruby-lang.org wrote:

[#21376] Re: nested require files need path internally — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/09/19

Hi,

[#21406] Re: nested require files need path internally — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2001/09/19

On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#21315] Suggestions for new CGI lib — anders@... (Anders Johannsen)

From the comp.lang.ruby thread "Minor cgi.rb question" (2001-09-03), I

21 messages 2001/09/18

[#21413] Ruby/objects book in style of The Little Lisper — Brian Marick <marick@...>

I fell in love with Lisp in the early 80's. Back then, I read a book called

36 messages 2001/09/19
[#21420] Re: Ruby/objects book in style of The Little Lisper — Christopher Sawtell <csawtell@...> 2001/09/20

On 20 Sep 2001 06:19:44 +0900, Brian Marick wrote:

[#21479] Re: Ruby/objects book in style of The Little Lisper — Kevin Smith <kevinbsmith@...> 2001/09/21

--- Christopher Sawtell <csawtell@paradise.net.nz> wrote:

[#21491] SV: Re: Ruby/objects book in style of The Little Lisper — "Mikkel Damsgaard" <mikkel_damsgaard@...> 2001/09/21

[#21494] Re: SV: Re: Ruby/objects book in style of The Little Lisper — Kevin Smith <kevinbsmith@...> 2001/09/21

--- Mikkel Damsgaard <mikkel_damsgaard@mailme.dk> wrote:

[#21510] Re: SV: Re: Ruby/objects book in style of The Little Lisper — Todd Gillespie <toddg@...> 2001/09/22

On Sat, 22 Sep 2001, Kevin Smith wrote:

[#21514] Re: SV: Re: Ruby/objects book in style of The Little Lisper — Kevin Smith <kevinbsmith@...> 2001/09/22

--- Todd Gillespie <toddg@mail.ma.utexas.edu> wrote:

[#21535] irb — Fabio <fabio.spelta@...>

Hello. :) I'm new here, and I have not found an archive of the previous

15 messages 2001/09/22

[#21616] opening a named pipe? — "Avdi B. Grimm" <avdi@...>

I'm having trouble reading from a named pipe in linux. basicly, I'm

12 messages 2001/09/24

[#21685] manipulating "immutable" objects such as Fixnum from within callbacks & al... — Guillaume Cottenceau <gc@...>

Hello,

15 messages 2001/09/25

[#21798] Ruby internal (guide to the source) — "Benoit Cerrina" <benoit.cerrina@...>

Hi,

22 messages 2001/09/28

[ruby-talk:21474] Re: make error: cannot exec gcc (after many compiles) : Win95 : Cygwin of 9/19/2001

From: "Gerrit P. Haase" <gp@...>
Date: 2001-09-20 23:47:10 UTC
List: ruby-talk #21474
Charles Hixson schrieb am 2001-09-20, 13:44:

>Summary:
>dllwrap: installation problem, cannot exec `gcc': No such file
>or directory
>dllwrap: gcc exited with status 255
>make: *** [dummy] Error 1

After configure and compiling, I cannot say more as before, sorry.
It works for me.  I have done:

./configure 2>&1 | tee log.configure
make 2>&1 | tee log.make
make install 2>&1 | tee log.install

Everything compiles and all is installed in place now.
Works as before:)

$ ruby --version
ruby 1.6.5 (2001-09-19) [i686-cygwin]

>Details:
>With the new installation of CygWin, I was attempting to compile
>   the new release of Ruby.  The compiles worked fine, the error
>occured during the attempt at a creation of a shared library.  I
>don't really understand make, but it looks relatively
>straightforward.
>
>The out.txt file has been edited to include the error message.
>It didn't appear in a simply redirected output file.  Strangely
>it didn't appear in a redirected stderr file either:
>make > out.txt 2>err.txt
>err.txt ends up blank, and out.txt doesn't include the error
>message, but it appears on the screen if I don't do a redirection.

I do redirection like shown above, that is o.k.

>P.S.:  Is there a bugzilla or something?  This seems a bit long
>to include in a post to a mailing list.

No, just post it. Better if you send it as attachment, so the output
gets not mangeled that much and is better readable then.

>Out.txt:
>gcc -g -O2 -I. -I. -I/usr/local/include -c array.c
[...]
>gcc -g -O2 -I. -I. -I/usr/local/include -c main.c

Up to here iyt is identical.

>gcc -g -O2  main.o dmyext.o librubys.a -lcrypt   -o miniruby.exe

gcc -g -O2 -s main.o dmyext.o librubys.a -lcrypt   -o miniruby.exe

Now here is a difference. '-s' is an additional flag here at my build.
'-s' comes with my standard LDFLAGS, that is also the main difference
in the Makefile. NOTE, for gnu make, GNUmkefile is the first Makefile.

>echo EXPORTS > ruby.def
>nm --extern-only --defined-only librubys.a | \
>   ./miniruby.exe -ne 'puts $1 if / [CDT] _(.*)$/' >> ruby.def
>windres --include-dir . --include-dir . --include-dir ./win32 
>dummy.rc dummy.res.o
>dllwrap --target=cygwin --as=as --dlltool-name=dlltool 
>--driver-name=gcc --export-all -s --output-exp=ruby.exp 
>--dllname=ruby.exe --output-lib=libcygwin-ruby16.a 
>--add-stdcall-alias --def=ruby.def array.o bignum.o class.o 
>compar.o dir.o dln.o enum.o error.o eval.o file.o gc.o hash.o 
>inits.o io.o marshal.o math.o numeric.o object.o pack.o parse.o 
>process.o prec.o random.o range.o re.o regex.o ruby.o signal.o 
>sprintf.o st.o string.o struct.o time.o util.o variable.o 
>version.o flock.o strftime.o  dmyext.o dummy.res.o -lcrypt   -o 
>dummy
>
>dllwrap: installation problem, cannot exec `gcc': No such file 
>or directory
>dllwrap: gcc exited with status 255
>make: *** [dummy] Error 1

And I get no error here. All builds fine.

>LDFLAGS =  $(CFLAGS)
LDFLAGS =  $(CFLAGS) -s

>a:  fd           N/A    N/A
>c:  hd  FAT32   9756Mb  86% CP    UN
>d:  hd  FAT32   1003Mb   4% CP    UN           WORK

No NT, no NTFS.
Win95 is pretty old nowadays...

One thing is interesting. As i built ruby-1.6.4 (IMO) it was build a
ruby.dll by default which it is not now, only a static ruby binary was
built.

Gerrit


-- 
=^..^=

In This Thread

Prev Next