From: Ned Konz <ned@...>
Date: 2001-09-09T00:14:53+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:21005] Re: destructor

On Saturday 08 September 2001 07:59 am, David Alan Black wrote:

> > Why are you passing the block to new() here? What if it doesn't take one?
>
> The &blk thing is provisional, like *params:

Ah. So if the constructor took a different block than you wanted to pass to 
use, you'd have to use proc to pass it in params?

-- 
Ned Konz
currently: Stanwood, WA
email:     ned@bike-nomad.com
homepage:  http://bike-nomad.com