From: David Alan Black <dblack@...>
Date: 2001-09-09T05:13:16+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:21012] Re: destructor

Hello --

On Sun, 9 Sep 2001, Ned Konz wrote:

> On Saturday 08 September 2001 07:59 am, David Alan Black wrote:
>
> > > Why are you passing the block to new() here? What if it doesn't take one?
> >
> > The &blk thing is provisional, like *params:
>
> Ah. So if the constructor took a different block than you wanted to pass to
> use, you'd have to use proc to pass it in params?

I guess some changes have been made to the specific example, but anyway:
yes :-)  Only one block can be associated with each method call, so to
have more than one block travel through a chain of method calls, the
others have to travel as arguments.


David

-- 
David Alan Black
home: dblack@candle.superlink.net
work: blackdav@shu.edu
Web:  http://pirate.shu.edu/~blackdav