[#5218] Ruby Book Eng tl, ch1 question — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

13 messages 2000/10/02

[#5404] Object.foo, setters and so on — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

OK, here is what I think I know.

14 messages 2000/10/11

[#5425] Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

18 messages 2000/10/11
[#5427] RE: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — OZAWA -Crouton- Sakuro <crouton@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 03:49:46 +0900,

[#5429] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...> 2000/10/11

Thanks for the input.

[#5432] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 04:53:41 +0900,

[#5516] Re: Some newbye question — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == Davide Marchignoli <marchign@di.unipi.it> writes:

80 messages 2000/10/13
[#5531] Re: Some newbye question — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/10/14

Hi,

[#5544] Re: Some newbye question — Davide Marchignoli <marchign@...> 2000/10/15

On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#5576] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/10/16

matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:

[#5617] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — "Brian F. Feldman" <green@...> 2000/10/16

Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> wrote:

[#5705] Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>

There has been discussion on this list/group from time to time about

16 messages 2000/10/20
[#5712] Re: Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Charles Hixson <charleshixsn@...> 2000/10/20

Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng wrote:

[#5882] [RFC] Towards a new synchronisation primitive — hipster <hipster@...4all.nl>

Hello fellow rubyists,

21 messages 2000/10/26

[ruby-talk:5950] Recent Perl6 News

From: "Conrad Schneiker/Austin/Contr/IBM" <schneik@...>
Date: 2000-10-30 20:28:52 UTC
List: ruby-talk #5950
Hi,

Needless to say, the following is very preliminary and somewhat ambiguous.

Some excerts from http://dev.perl.org/~ask/als/ that may be of interest:

===========================================================
*   The language will be dynamically extensible, using modules written in
    Perl. So you can program in a language that looks like Python, Latin,
    or Java, if you want. In this sense, the Perl compiler and runtime
    system become a meta-language (extra-lingual?) system that lets you
    code in your own favourite little (or large) language. Perl would just
    be one of the languages you could implement. 

*   The flip-side of this is little languages: make it easy for folks to
    have their own domain-specific "little" language. Make Perl a
    environment for building domain-specific languages. 

*   The Perl compiler and interpreter systems will be designed so that
    they can emit C, Java, and C# code. This doesn't mean that perl6 will
    ship with all three back-ends, but they will be easy to implement. 
===========================================================

Conrad Schneiker
(This note is unofficial and subject to improvement without notice.)

In This Thread

Prev Next