[#5218] Ruby Book Eng tl, ch1 question — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

13 messages 2000/10/02

[#5404] Object.foo, setters and so on — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

OK, here is what I think I know.

14 messages 2000/10/11

[#5425] Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

18 messages 2000/10/11
[#5427] RE: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — OZAWA -Crouton- Sakuro <crouton@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 03:49:46 +0900,

[#5429] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...> 2000/10/11

Thanks for the input.

[#5432] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 04:53:41 +0900,

[#5516] Re: Some newbye question — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == Davide Marchignoli <marchign@di.unipi.it> writes:

80 messages 2000/10/13
[#5531] Re: Some newbye question — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/10/14

Hi,

[#5544] Re: Some newbye question — Davide Marchignoli <marchign@...> 2000/10/15

On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#5576] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/10/16

matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:

[#5617] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — "Brian F. Feldman" <green@...> 2000/10/16

Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> wrote:

[#5705] Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>

There has been discussion on this list/group from time to time about

16 messages 2000/10/20
[#5712] Re: Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Charles Hixson <charleshixsn@...> 2000/10/20

Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng wrote:

[#5882] [RFC] Towards a new synchronisation primitive — hipster <hipster@...4all.nl>

Hello fellow rubyists,

21 messages 2000/10/26

[ruby-talk:5728] Re: String#slice surprise

From: Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
Date: 2000-10-21 06:25:00 UTC
List: ruby-talk #5728
"Guy N. Hurst" <gnhurst@hurstlinks.com> writes:

> Suppose $string="Hello there"
> 
> In Perl (and PHP),
> 
> substr($string, 4, 1) == "o"
> and substr($string, 4, 3) == "o t"
> but substr($string, 4) == "o there"
> 
> In other words, if you leave out the third parameter ('length'), 
> it just goes to the end of the string. Makes perfect sense, and
> is balanced well by the functionality to extract a single character.
> 
> In Ruby,
> 
> string.slice(4,1) == "o"
> and string.slice(4,3) == "o t"
> but string.slice(4) == 111  	# (!)

Ruby gives you the option of returning a single character as either a
string or as a byte. This flexibility comes in vry handy when you're
dealing with strings that contain binary data.

> What is worse, if I *do* wish to get a substring from a starting
> position to the end, it seems I have to use an embedded function:
> 
> string.slice(4..string.size) == "o there"

Negative indices count from the end of a string

  string = "hello there"	
  string[4..-1]		# => "o there"
  string[-4, 2]		# => "he"
  string[-6..-2]        # => " ther"


Regards


Dave

In This Thread