[#5218] Ruby Book Eng tl, ch1 question — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

13 messages 2000/10/02

[#5404] Object.foo, setters and so on — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

OK, here is what I think I know.

14 messages 2000/10/11

[#5425] Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

18 messages 2000/10/11
[#5427] RE: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — OZAWA -Crouton- Sakuro <crouton@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 03:49:46 +0900,

[#5429] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...> 2000/10/11

Thanks for the input.

[#5432] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 04:53:41 +0900,

[#5516] Re: Some newbye question — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == Davide Marchignoli <marchign@di.unipi.it> writes:

80 messages 2000/10/13
[#5531] Re: Some newbye question — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/10/14

Hi,

[#5544] Re: Some newbye question — Davide Marchignoli <marchign@...> 2000/10/15

On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#5576] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/10/16

matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:

[#5617] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — "Brian F. Feldman" <green@...> 2000/10/16

Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> wrote:

[#5705] Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>

There has been discussion on this list/group from time to time about

16 messages 2000/10/20
[#5712] Re: Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Charles Hixson <charleshixsn@...> 2000/10/20

Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng wrote:

[#5882] [RFC] Towards a new synchronisation primitive — hipster <hipster@...4all.nl>

Hello fellow rubyists,

21 messages 2000/10/26

[ruby-talk:5413] Re: Object.foo, setters and so on

From: "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>
Date: 2000-10-11 05:52:02 UTC
List: ruby-talk #5413
Ahh. So we're not talking about the toplevel. Thanks.

Hal

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com>
To: ruby-talk ML <ruby-talk@netlab.co.jp>
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 10:16 PM
Subject: [ruby-talk:5412] Re: Object.foo, setters and so on


> "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@hypermetrics.com> writes:
> 
> > What does this entry in the FAQ mean?
> 
> say you have
> 
>    class Dave
> 
>      def fred
>        @fred
>      end
> 
>      def fred=(n)
>        @fred = n
>      end
> 
>      def test
>        fred = 99
>      end
>    end
> 
> You might be tempted to think that the line 'fred = 99' in method
> 'test' calls the method 'fred='. After all, method calls in functional 
> form have 'self.' implicitly prepended, right?
> 
> Unfortunately not. In this case, Ruby will look at 'fred = 99' and
> simply assign 99 to a local variable 'fred'. To invoke the setter
> method, you need to make the self. explicit:
> 
> 
>      def test
>        self.fred = 99
>      end
> 
> 
> Regards
> 
> 
> Dave
> 


In This Thread