[#5218] Ruby Book Eng tl, ch1 question — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

13 messages 2000/10/02

[#5404] Object.foo, setters and so on — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

OK, here is what I think I know.

14 messages 2000/10/11

[#5425] Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

18 messages 2000/10/11
[#5427] RE: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — OZAWA -Crouton- Sakuro <crouton@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 03:49:46 +0900,

[#5429] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...> 2000/10/11

Thanks for the input.

[#5432] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 04:53:41 +0900,

[#5516] Re: Some newbye question — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == Davide Marchignoli <marchign@di.unipi.it> writes:

80 messages 2000/10/13
[#5531] Re: Some newbye question — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/10/14

Hi,

[#5544] Re: Some newbye question — Davide Marchignoli <marchign@...> 2000/10/15

On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#5576] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/10/16

matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:

[#5617] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — "Brian F. Feldman" <green@...> 2000/10/16

Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> wrote:

[#5705] Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>

There has been discussion on this list/group from time to time about

16 messages 2000/10/20
[#5712] Re: Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Charles Hixson <charleshixsn@...> 2000/10/20

Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng wrote:

[#5882] [RFC] Towards a new synchronisation primitive — hipster <hipster@...4all.nl>

Hello fellow rubyists,

21 messages 2000/10/26

[ruby-talk:5924] user installation of ruby-mode.el

From: David Suarez de Lis <excalibor@...>
Date: 2000-10-27 16:18:46 UTC
List: ruby-talk #5924
Hi all,

I've successfully built ruby-1.6.1 under Solaris...

People here uses XEmacs (instead of ViM, poor lusers ;-) [1] and so I tried to install both emacs elisp scripts, but, even when I've added the path where the modes live, the program refuses to catch them, which is very annoying...

[1] Not a religious war, please, just stating my preferences, I really like Emacs but I prefer vim... btw they just have the clumsy (sort of) classical vi on this, which is definitely worse than XEmacs 20.x (although it doesn't eat so much memory)

I made a local ($HOME/) install of Ruby and added

(setq load-path
  (append load-path 
    '( "$HOME/build/ruby-1.6.1/misc" )))

and checked it's actually added (which it is) in my .emacs .

Any ideas, help?

thanks a bunch,
david


----------------------------------------------------------------------
+  Mensaje enviado gracias al correo gratuito de Desmasiado Corp.    +
+                  http://correo.demasiado.com                       +
----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

In This Thread

Prev Next