[#5218] Ruby Book Eng tl, ch1 question — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

13 messages 2000/10/02

[#5404] Object.foo, setters and so on — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

OK, here is what I think I know.

14 messages 2000/10/11

[#5425] Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

18 messages 2000/10/11
[#5427] RE: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — OZAWA -Crouton- Sakuro <crouton@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 03:49:46 +0900,

[#5429] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...> 2000/10/11

Thanks for the input.

[#5432] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 04:53:41 +0900,

[#5516] Re: Some newbye question — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == Davide Marchignoli <marchign@di.unipi.it> writes:

80 messages 2000/10/13
[#5531] Re: Some newbye question — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/10/14

Hi,

[#5544] Re: Some newbye question — Davide Marchignoli <marchign@...> 2000/10/15

On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#5576] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/10/16

matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:

[#5617] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — "Brian F. Feldman" <green@...> 2000/10/16

Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> wrote:

[#5705] Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>

There has been discussion on this list/group from time to time about

16 messages 2000/10/20
[#5712] Re: Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Charles Hixson <charleshixsn@...> 2000/10/20

Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng wrote:

[#5882] [RFC] Towards a new synchronisation primitive — hipster <hipster@...4all.nl>

Hello fellow rubyists,

21 messages 2000/10/26

[ruby-talk:5631] Re: lint?

From: "Franz GEIGER" <fgeiger@...>
Date: 2000-10-17 09:40:03 UTC
List: ruby-talk #5631
> I'm afraid it requires static type information, which Ruby does not have.

Does it really? What about typos? E.g. someone "defines" a param
NavigationDefinition but refers to it as NavgationDefinition. Why do we have
to find such errors at runtime?

Don't get me wrong. At time of this writing this concerns all scripting
languages.

Finding type mismatches seems to me requiring static typing. But that's step
two - 1st one has to find all his typos.

Regards
Franz GEIGER


Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@zetabits.com> schrieb in im Newsbeitrag:
E13lNEc-0003Nd-00@ev.netlab.zetabits.co.jp...
> Hi,
>
> In message "[ruby-talk:5619] lint?"
>     on 00/10/17, "Swit" <swit@spam.com> writes:
>
> |Is there something like lint for Ruby?  I'd like to find NameErrors
before
> |runtime.
>
> I'm afraid it requires static type information, which Ruby does not have.
> Enlighten me if anybody have a good idea.
>
> matz.
>



In This Thread