[#5218] Ruby Book Eng tl, ch1 question — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

13 messages 2000/10/02

[#5404] Object.foo, setters and so on — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

OK, here is what I think I know.

14 messages 2000/10/11

[#5425] Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

18 messages 2000/10/11
[#5427] RE: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — OZAWA -Crouton- Sakuro <crouton@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 03:49:46 +0900,

[#5429] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...> 2000/10/11

Thanks for the input.

[#5432] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 04:53:41 +0900,

[#5516] Re: Some newbye question — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == Davide Marchignoli <marchign@di.unipi.it> writes:

80 messages 2000/10/13
[#5531] Re: Some newbye question — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/10/14

Hi,

[#5544] Re: Some newbye question — Davide Marchignoli <marchign@...> 2000/10/15

On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#5576] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/10/16

matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:

[#5617] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — "Brian F. Feldman" <green@...> 2000/10/16

Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> wrote:

[#5705] Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>

There has been discussion on this list/group from time to time about

16 messages 2000/10/20
[#5712] Re: Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Charles Hixson <charleshixsn@...> 2000/10/20

Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng wrote:

[#5882] [RFC] Towards a new synchronisation primitive — hipster <hipster@...4all.nl>

Hello fellow rubyists,

21 messages 2000/10/26

[ruby-talk:5410] Re: Object.foo, setters and so on

From: "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>
Date: 2000-10-11 05:02:17 UTC
List: ruby-talk #5410
What does this entry in the FAQ mean?

Hal

> 4.8 I can't get def pos=(val) to work.
>
> I have the following code, but I cannot use the method pos = 1.
>
>     def pos=(val)
>  print @pos, "\n"
>    @pos = val
> d
>
> Methods with = appended must be called with a receiver (without the
receiver, you're just assigning to a local variable).
> Invoke it as self.pos = 1.




----- Original Message -----
From: Yasushi Shoji <yashi@yashi.com>
To: ruby-talk ML <ruby-talk@netlab.co.jp>
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 8:07 PM
Subject: [ruby-talk:5406] Re: Object.foo, setters and so on


> At Wed, 11 Oct 2000 11:37:25 +0900,
> Hal E. Fulton <hal9000@hypermetrics.com> wrote:
> >
> > OK, here is what I think I know.
> >
> > These three fragements differ only in that the last one defines a
> > private method, no?
>
> nop
>
> > class Object
> >   def foo
> >     ...
> >   end
> > end
>
> you defined public method 'foo' in class Object
>
> you call it:
> Object.new.foo
>
> > def foo
> >   ...
> > end
>
> you defined private method 'foo' in class Object
>
> you call it
> foo # no receiver.
>
> > def Object.foo
> >   ...
> > end
>
> you defined singleton method for class Object
>
> you call it
> Object.foo
>
> > And isn't it true that a method like bar= must be called with a
receiver?
>
> nop.
>
> > Then why won't this work?
>
> so that's just the way it is.
>
> > def bar=
> >   ...
> > end
> >
> > self.bar = 5
>
> however, i don't know why the following doesn't work :(
>
> def bar=(value)
>   p value
> end
>
> bar = 5
>
> > It tells me that bar is private. Why?
>
> because you defined private method :) this thing came up on -talk a
> few days ago, no?
>
> > [2  <text/html; iso-8859-1 (quoted-printable)>]
>
> and you can keep your the html file.
>
> hope it helps
> --
>             yashi
>
>


In This Thread