[#5218] Ruby Book Eng tl, ch1 question — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

13 messages 2000/10/02

[#5404] Object.foo, setters and so on — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

OK, here is what I think I know.

14 messages 2000/10/11

[#5425] Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

18 messages 2000/10/11
[#5427] RE: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — OZAWA -Crouton- Sakuro <crouton@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 03:49:46 +0900,

[#5429] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...> 2000/10/11

Thanks for the input.

[#5432] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 04:53:41 +0900,

[#5516] Re: Some newbye question — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == Davide Marchignoli <marchign@di.unipi.it> writes:

80 messages 2000/10/13
[#5531] Re: Some newbye question — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/10/14

Hi,

[#5544] Re: Some newbye question — Davide Marchignoli <marchign@...> 2000/10/15

On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#5576] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/10/16

matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:

[#5617] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — "Brian F. Feldman" <green@...> 2000/10/16

Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> wrote:

[#5705] Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>

There has been discussion on this list/group from time to time about

16 messages 2000/10/20
[#5712] Re: Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Charles Hixson <charleshixsn@...> 2000/10/20

Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng wrote:

[#5882] [RFC] Towards a new synchronisation primitive — hipster <hipster@...4all.nl>

Hello fellow rubyists,

21 messages 2000/10/26

[ruby-talk:5833] Re: Array#insert rehashed

From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2000-10-25 03:33:01 UTC
List: ruby-talk #5833
Hi,

In message "[ruby-talk:5830] Array#insert rehashed"
    on 00/10/25, Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@cinnober.com> writes:

|As I pursued for the Array#insert some time ago, I happened to find this
|"feature":
|
|  $ ruby -v -e'a=[1,2,3]; a[1,0]=a; p a;'
|  ruby 1.6.2 (2000-10-16) [i686-linux]
|  [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]

This and [ruby-talk:5831] are caused by a bug.

--- array.c	2000/10/10 07:03:15	1.30
+++ array.c	2000/10/25 03:32:48
@@ -533,2 +533,4 @@
 {
+    int rlen;
+
     if (len < 0) rb_raise(rb_eIndexError, "negative length %d", len);
@@ -551,2 +553,3 @@
     }
+    rlen = RARRAY(rpl)->len;
 
@@ -554,3 +557,3 @@
     if (beg >= RARRAY(ary)->len) {
-	len = beg + RARRAY(rpl)->len;
+	len = beg + rlen;
 	if (len >= RARRAY(ary)->capa) {
@@ -560,3 +563,3 @@
 	rb_mem_clear(RARRAY(ary)->ptr+RARRAY(ary)->len, beg-RARRAY(ary)->len);
-	MEMCPY(RARRAY(ary)->ptr+beg, RARRAY(rpl)->ptr, VALUE, RARRAY(rpl)->len);
+	MEMCPY(RARRAY(ary)->ptr+beg, RARRAY(rpl)->ptr, VALUE, rlen);
 	RARRAY(ary)->len = len;
@@ -570,3 +573,3 @@
 
-	alen = RARRAY(ary)->len + RARRAY(rpl)->len - len;
+	alen = RARRAY(ary)->len + rlen - len;
 	if (alen >= RARRAY(ary)->capa) {
@@ -577,3 +580,3 @@
 	if (len != RARRAY(rpl)->len) {
-	    MEMMOVE(RARRAY(ary)->ptr+beg+RARRAY(rpl)->len, RARRAY(ary)->ptr+beg+len,
+	    MEMMOVE(RARRAY(ary)->ptr+beg+rlen, RARRAY(ary)->ptr+beg+len,
 		    VALUE, RARRAY(ary)->len-(beg+len));
@@ -581,3 +584,3 @@
 	}
-	MEMCPY(RARRAY(ary)->ptr+beg, RARRAY(rpl)->ptr, VALUE, RARRAY(rpl)->len);
+	MEMMOVE(RARRAY(ary)->ptr+beg, RARRAY(rpl)->ptr, VALUE, rlen);
     }

In This Thread