[#5218] Ruby Book Eng tl, ch1 question — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

13 messages 2000/10/02

[#5404] Object.foo, setters and so on — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

OK, here is what I think I know.

14 messages 2000/10/11

[#5425] Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

18 messages 2000/10/11
[#5427] RE: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — OZAWA -Crouton- Sakuro <crouton@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 03:49:46 +0900,

[#5429] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...> 2000/10/11

Thanks for the input.

[#5432] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 04:53:41 +0900,

[#5516] Re: Some newbye question — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == Davide Marchignoli <marchign@di.unipi.it> writes:

80 messages 2000/10/13
[#5531] Re: Some newbye question — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/10/14

Hi,

[#5544] Re: Some newbye question — Davide Marchignoli <marchign@...> 2000/10/15

On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#5576] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/10/16

matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:

[#5617] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — "Brian F. Feldman" <green@...> 2000/10/16

Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> wrote:

[#5705] Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>

There has been discussion on this list/group from time to time about

16 messages 2000/10/20
[#5712] Re: Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Charles Hixson <charleshixsn@...> 2000/10/20

Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng wrote:

[#5882] [RFC] Towards a new synchronisation primitive — hipster <hipster@...4all.nl>

Hello fellow rubyists,

21 messages 2000/10/26

[ruby-talk:5875] Re: Integer(String) weirdness for a ruby newbie

From: Mark Slagell <ms@...>
Date: 2000-10-26 17:41:34 UTC
List: ruby-talk #5875
Stoned Elipot wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> I tried to track the following problem - well at least to me it seems that
> there's a problem somewhere - into ruby 1.6.2-preview sources
> without clear success.
> 
> Can someone please give me a hint ?
> 
> $ ruby -v
> ruby 1.6.2 (2000-10-18) [sparc-netbsd1.4.1]
> $ echo 'p Integer("zzzzzzzz")' | ruby
> -:1:in `Integer': invalid literal for Integer: zzzzzzzz (ArgumentError)
>         from -:1
> $ echo 'p Integer("zzzzzzzzz")' | ruby
> 0
> $

Maybe you want "zzzzzzzzz".to_i, which returns 0.

to_i ignores leading/following characters that aren't in the 0-9 range
and so never causes errors. Integer() is interested in a base radix,
like "0x", and raises an exception if it sees a bad one. That is to say,
it is probably right to complain about a zexadecimal number. :-)

In This Thread