[#5218] Ruby Book Eng tl, ch1 question — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

13 messages 2000/10/02

[#5404] Object.foo, setters and so on — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

OK, here is what I think I know.

14 messages 2000/10/11

[#5425] Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

18 messages 2000/10/11
[#5427] RE: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — OZAWA -Crouton- Sakuro <crouton@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 03:49:46 +0900,

[#5429] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...> 2000/10/11

Thanks for the input.

[#5432] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 04:53:41 +0900,

[#5516] Re: Some newbye question — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == Davide Marchignoli <marchign@di.unipi.it> writes:

80 messages 2000/10/13
[#5531] Re: Some newbye question — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/10/14

Hi,

[#5544] Re: Some newbye question — Davide Marchignoli <marchign@...> 2000/10/15

On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#5576] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/10/16

matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:

[#5617] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — "Brian F. Feldman" <green@...> 2000/10/16

Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> wrote:

[#5705] Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>

There has been discussion on this list/group from time to time about

16 messages 2000/10/20
[#5712] Re: Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Charles Hixson <charleshixsn@...> 2000/10/20

Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng wrote:

[#5882] [RFC] Towards a new synchronisation primitive — hipster <hipster@...4all.nl>

Hello fellow rubyists,

21 messages 2000/10/26

[ruby-talk:5853] Re: Array#insert rehashed

From: "Guy N. Hurst" <gnhurst@...>
Date: 2000-10-25 18:08:43 UTC
List: ruby-talk #5853
Dave Thomas wrote:
> ...
> True 'nuff, although
> 
>    b = [1,2,3]
>    a[1,0] = [b]
> 
> Does what you'd want.
> 

hmm.


irb(main):001:0> a=[1,2,3]
[1, 2, 3]
irb(main):002:0> a[1,0]=[a]
[[1, [...], 2, 3]]
irb(main):003:0> a
[1, [...], 2, 3]
irb(main):004:0> a[1]
[1, [...], 2, 3]
irb(main):005:0> a[1][1]
[1, [...], 2, 3]
irb(main):006:0> a[1][1][1][1]
[1, [...], 2, 3]
irb(main):007:0> a[1][1,1]
[[1, [...], 2, 3]]
irb(main):008:0> a[1,1][0][1,1]
[[1, [...], 2, 3]]
irb(main):009:0> a[1][1][1][1][1][1][1][1][1][1]
[1, [...], 2, 3]
irb(main):010:0> a.flatten
ArgumentError: tryed to flatten recursive array
(irb):12:in `flatten'
(irb):12:in `irb_binding'
irb(main):013:0> a[1][1][1][1][0]
1
irb(main):014:0>

This is certainly interesting  :-)

I didn't realize Ruby could handle a recursive array

(ps 'tryed' should be 'tried')

> Not being able to extend at the end is a problem, but then there's
> always #push
> 

Yes, and also +=

But that leaves something to be desired, nonetheless.

> However, can I make a suggestion?
> 
> Let's not implement this in C code, but in a Ruby-language module. Let
> people use it that way and get experience with it before making code
> changes in the interpreter.
>

That may be fine for #insert, but what about changing the semantics
of negative position?
 


Guy N. Hurst

-- 
HurstLinks Web Development    http://www.hurstlinks.com/
Norfolk, VA - (757)623-9688
PHP/MySQL - Ruby/Perl - HTML/Javascript

In This Thread